Category Archives: International

Occupy America! U.S. Capitalist Airline industry is a big FAIL! History of bankruptcies and losses! Testimonies before Congress prove it! More proof that American Airlines can’t be trusted!

“The airline industry has the worst financial performance of any of our major business sectors. While the industry has enjoyed some profitable years, airline operators as a whole have lost money since deregulation in 1978.”– from Current Situation and Future Outlook of U.S. Commercial Airline Industry, September 28, 2005

In September 2005, the U.S. House of Representatives’ Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the Subcommittee on Aviation, heard testimonies on the economic viability of the U.S. airline industry.  It wasn’t good.

Here’s some quotes from the report:

“Historically, airlines have failed at a much higher rate than most other types of businesses.”

“In fact the U.S. airline industry has seen 150 bankruptcy filings in the last 25 years, an average of almost six per year.”

Bankruptcies don’t work because “…history has shown that the growth of airline industry capacity [a type of competition based on supply and demand] has continued unaffected even by major liquidations.”

“Over the past four years, U.S. commercial airlines have lost over $32 billion collectively and it is estimated that the industry will experience another $10 billion in loss in 2005.”

Don’t blame the September 11, 2001 attacks, the airlines were in trouble before that: “…well over 100,000 jobs have been lost in this industry since that time [the year 2000] and just recently, in concert with their announced bankruptcies…”

Don’t blame the cost of labor, like the CEO of American Airlines is doing: “Numerous factors have contributed to the problem and Mr. Kiefer mentioned some of them. I would say that three stand out in the current environment: very high jet fuel prices, intense price competition in the domestic market; and heavy debt and pension burdens.”

So they whine about fuel prices, but haven’t they been jacking up their ticket prices to cover that? They whine about competition! Isn’t competition the American Capitalist way? I think the mantra goes ‘if you can’t handle the competition then you should get out of the business’. And they whine about being in debt! You see, we individuals have been lectured for years about the sins of debt, yet the biggest debt offenders are the Corporations of America (after the Federal government)!

However, a professor from the Northeastern University Boston, and a senior fellow from the Brookings Institution, testified that in their opinion the three biggest costs to the airline industry is fuel, competition and labor.

Speaking of labor and American Airlines, the 2005 testimonies show that labor cost for the now bankrupt airline had already been reduced: “…airline employees have been asked to take substantial pay cuts, trim their benefits and in some cases, lose their jobs. Exhibit 5 in my remarks shows broad expense categories for AMR, parent of American Airlines, in 2002 and in the second quarter of 2005. Over that period labor costs declined from 41 percent of total expenses to 32 percent.”

Again, don’t blame the cost of labor: “…airlines have undertaken significant steps to trim their losses but these have so far been insufficient to restore profitability, largely because of the fuel prices.”

The nature of the industry makes it almost impossible to make a profit, it involves a lot of guessing and optimism: “The airline industry has always been a cyclical one because the demand for air travel is sensitive to the level of economic activity and carriers must invest in capacity well before they know the level of economic activity and demand.”

Airlines have always used bankruptcy to destroy union labor contracts, in the name of competition: “Legacy carriers have been cutting costs where they can and since labor is the largest category of airline costs, it has been the target
of cost cutting and enhanced productivity through negotiation as well as in bankruptcy as the legacy carriers seek to reduce costs to compete with low cost carriers.”

Some officials blamed the consumers for not being able to pay higher ticket prices, and blamed airline executives for not having the guts to pass on the true cost of fuel to their customers, again in the name of competition: “The airline industry however suffers from the burden of having to pay high prices without the flexibility of necessarily receiving higher fares. Historically, carriers have been loathe to pass on higher fuel costs in the form of any additional tariff for fear of being undercut by competition. This has led to a vicious cycle within the industry…” In other words, ticket prices haven’t gone high enough!

According to testimony from Moody’s officials, most airlines that go bankrupt don’t really change the way they do business: “Airlines operating in bankruptcy generally continue to pay airport rates and charges and in most cases do not radically downsize their operations.”

Testimony at the 2005 hearings foretold of American Airlines’ bankruptcy filing on November 29, 2011. The testimony was about what else American Airlines could do to further reduce their costs, and how to do it: Mr. MICA. “Again, pensions would still be sort of the big enchilada in obligations and fuel?”
Mr. BAGGALEY. “Actually, the largest portion of American and other airlines’ obligations are secured debt and leases. Pension deficits are significant but they are a minority of the total.”
Mr. MICA. “The only way you can restructure those would be through bankruptcy or negotiation?”
Mr. BAGGALEY. “Yes.”

Philip Baggaley, of Standard & Poor’s, also testified that many financial problems for the airline industry are “inherent” and go back before the 1990s.

Baggaley also explained that a major reason for legacy (airlines created before the 1978 deregulation) airlines filing bankruptcy was to destroy the pension (retirement) programs for their employees.  He admitted that financial institutions like to see companies destroy their employees’ retirement plans, and rewarded the companies with better credit ratings!

Baggaley also explained that wages and benefits are always the target of corporations, because it is the easiest to control.  Airline executives target labor as a way to offset the uncontrollable fuel costs. However, he showed that fuel costs have gone up so much that drastic labor cuts, without declaring bankruptcy, are no longer enough.  From 2002 to 2005 American Airlines gained, or saved, $1.8 billion in labor concessions, but they still lost $3.2 billion to fuel costs.

Baggaley also explained that while company mergers normally work for other industries, in reducing overall costs, history shows that mergers actually increase operating costs for legacy airlines.  He called it a “zero sum game”, and added that the only potential benefit for airlines filing for bankruptcy, and even merging, is that it’s a way of reducing competition: “…bankruptcy restructuring and mergers have the potential to improve the industry’s financial health, but only if accompanied by reduced capacity [a way of reducing competition] and, most important, by lowering operating costs.” Remember, competition is one of the three main reasons the airline industry is failing.

Mark Kiefer, of CRA International (economic and management consulting firm), testified that the problems with the airline industry go all the way back to the 1978 deregulation. He explained that the only time the airlines were really “profitable” was when they were being regulated by the Federal government!

Kiefer said government regulation kept ticket prices up, and limited the number of airlines allowed to operate (thus killing competition).  Since deregulation ticket prices dropped, and smaller more competitive airlines were born. Even after more than 30 years, the bigger, older (legacy) airlines just can not compete with the smaller younger Low Cost Carrier (LCC) airlines.  Under the traditional concept of capitalism, doesn’t that mean the legacy airlines should be allowed to die?

Kiefer also explained that the legacy airlines are still operating pre-deregulation when it came to wages and benefits for employees.  They tend to pay more than the LCC airlines, and offer company health and retirement benefits.  Kiefer says no LCC airline offers such benefits.  LCCs do offer “…defined contribution and profit sharing plans that have a much lower overall cost to the airline.”

Steven Morrison, Northeastern University Boston, and Clifford Winston from the Brookings Institution, say that, amazingly even after 30 years, the legacy airlines “…still needs time to adjust to its deregulatory freedoms by ridding itself of remaining cost inefficiencies…” In other words, the last hurdle to fully deregulating the legacy airlines is unionized labor.

But while the highly edjumacated college officials blamed labor for the airlines’ problems, U.S. Representative James Oberstar put the blame squarely on the legacy airlines: “Since deregulation, the legacy airlines’ revenue model has depended on extracting premium fares from a small percentage of passengers. That revenue model began to unravel in the year 2000…”

Of interest is the testimony from the executive director of the Air Carrier Association of America, Edward Faberman. Who better to explain to woes of the airline industry, and guess what, he did not blame labor!  He blamed, in order, fuel costs, homeland security costs, airport expenses, air traffic control expenses, Customs & Border Control service expenses, and finally cancelled flights.

Very interestingly, Faberman actually countered the claims of many of the experts mentioned above. Even though the airline industry was deregulated back in 1978, the legacy airlines are still getting subsidized by the government!  He basically said that in the name of competitive capitalism the big old legacy airlines should be allowed to die off, and that the LCCs should take over.

Finally, here’s what the airline officials in the United Kingdom think of the U.S. airline industry: “But America, land of the free, is turning itself into the land of the free ride. In the last four years, the airlines have soaked up $15 to $20 billion of public subsidy and loan guarantees. They’re operating in protected markets, they’re hoovering up public funds and they still can’t make a profit. They are dumping capacity on the North Atlantic, distorting competition and pricing for cash. They struggle to compete and, at some, the workforce has been demoralized. The more the government has tried to help, the worse things have become.”-Rod Eddington, CEO British Airways, September 22, 2005

 

 

 

Global Economic War: Russians have the money. Mazda, Renault, Nissan, VW, GM and Fiat make their move

“Russia is Mazda’s second largest market in Europe and sales are rapidly increasing. Mazda sold approximately 28,000 units during the period from January through September 2011, a year on year increase of approximately 77%!”-Mazda Motors statement

Mazda announced they’ve made an U.S.$80 million joint venture deal with Russian car maker Sollers.  By next autumn they will begin production of Mazda cars in the far eastern city of Vladivostok.

Mazda is not the only foreign car maker to make moves on the Russian car market: Renault-Nissan, General Motors, Izuzu, SsangYong, Fiat and Volkswagen have all started production in Russian factories.

 

No Economic Recovery for Japan. Blame Europe

The head of Bank of Japan announced that as long as Europe struggles with a credit crisis, the value of the Japanese yen will keep going up.  That’s bad when Japan’s economy is based on exports. The more their yen is worth, the more their products will cost.

Masaaki Shirakawa said the result is that more and more Japanese companies will move their operations to other countries.  That means unemployment in Japan will only go up.

The Japanese Labor Ministry reported that there are now, officially, 2.88 million Japanese who can not find jobs.  They also said that while unemployment has been going up, the number of jobs available are unchanged.

Global Economic War: Get ready for stocks to go up. China just said they’re willing to invest big time in Europe, wants to take over European companies, but the price has to be right

“Some European countries are facing a debt crisis and hope to convert their assets to cash and would like foreign capital to acquire their enterprises. We will be closely watching and pushing forward the progress.”-Chen Deming, Commerce Minister of China

The Commerce Minister of China just told a group of Chinese businessmen that the Europeans are desperate for cash, and they’re willing to sell their companies for it.

Chinese officials say they are more than willing to bailout European companies by buying them out. However, they warn that if European governments continue their harsh anti-Chinese policies then no deal!

Recently Spain sent a delegation to China, hoping to get financial help.

World War 3: China condemns U.S. attack on Pakistan, pushes to build bases in Pakistan

“China is deeply shocked by these events, and expresses strong concern for the victims and profound condolences to Pakistan.”-Hong Lei, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman

China is condemning the recent U.S. led NATO/ISAF attack on Pakistani troops. China and Pakistan are steadfast allies, with China being Pakistan’s number one military supporter.  The United States is still Pakistan’s second biggest military supporter, even after canceling $800 million in military aid back in July.

China and Pakistan just finished joint war games days before the NATO/ISAF attack.

China is also negotiating with the Pakistani government to set up Chinese army bases in areas of Pakistan that border China’s Xinjiang province.   The Pakistani government has also asked China to build a naval base at the southwestern seaport of Gwadar, in Balochistan province.

World War 3: Pakistan refuses to take part in Bonn Conference on Afghanistan Security, rejects NATO apology

“We do not accept NATO apology.  NATO was not chasing militants.”-Major General Athar Abbas, Pakistani army

Pakistan continues to move away from the United States, after a deadly U.S. led NATO/ISAF attack on Pakistani troops.  They are now boycotting the December 5 Bonn Conference on Afghanistan’s security.

Foreign Ministers from at least 90 countries (including Hillary Clinton) are expected to attend the Bonn Conference, to discuss key issues like the withdrawal of foreign forces from Afghanistan, and negotiations with the majority political party, and militant group, the Taliban.

Pakaistani army officials say the NATO/ISAF claim that they were shooting at militants is false because the area they attacked was 200 to 300 meters (about 984 feet) inside Pakistani territory, and, had already been cleared of militant activity.  Earlier reports from Pakistan claimed the attack took place a mile and a half inside Pakistani territory.

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate Incompetence: Another Japanese company loses millions in cash, this time in Casinos! Call it a family affair?

The Japanese paper company, Daio Paper, is in financial trouble after it was discovered that a, now former, executive borrowed millions of company dollars to gamble in overseas casinos!

Tokyo prosecutors are investigating Mototaka Ikawa.  They say Ikawa borrowed more than U.S.$128 million from seven subsidiary companies between May 2010 and September of this year.  They believe he spent the money in casinos in Macao and Singapore.

Unnamed sources claim that Ikawa actually borrowed much more, all from subsidiary companies that are run by his relatives!  In a specific case, a Kagawa Prefecture golf club owned by the company, says $6.8 million of their money is missing.

Prosecutors say Ikawa thought it was a safe bet to borrow from his own company, because he didn’t think the missing cash would be reported!  Some gambler!

After more than a year, and after a credit downgrade, Belgium will finally create a government

Since March 2010 Belgium has been without an official government.  The problem arose when Dutch speaking Belgians (Flemish) took control in elections, then suggested splitting the country into two halves; one side for French speakers (francophones), the other side for Dutch speakers.

The 2010 elections came about after the Belgian King dissolved the previous government, due to scandal.

Now, and possibly due to the fact that their credit rating just got dropped, six major political groups have agreed on a new government.  They hope to form the government by next week.  Up until the 2010 elections, Belgium was considered a stable European country.

Belgium isn’t the only country that’s gone a long time without a government. Cambodia has the record of 353 days without a government, from 2003 to 2004.

 

Corporate Hypocrisy: FMC spends money to take over companies that clean up pollution, yet refuses to clean up Idaho Super Fund site? FMC issues millions in debt notes, to join the growing trend of stock buybacks by Corporate America.

From 1949 to 2001, U.S. based FMC operated a phosphorus processing plant in southeastern Idaho, just west of Pocatello and Chubbuck.  Ten years later that plant is now an EPA Superfund site, and locals are still waiting for FMC to clean it up!

The hypocrisy is that FMC has been going around spending money buying up companies that specialize in environmental clean up!  The most recent purchase was Canada’s Adventus Intellectual Property: “Adventus presents an exceptional opportunity for FMC to broaden its growing portfolio of advanced specialty solutions serving the global site remediation market.”-Mark Douglas, FMC Industrial Chemicals

FMC site, west of Pocatello and Chubbuck, south of Fort Hall Reservation

So if FMC can buy up companies that specialize in environmental clean up, why can’t FMC clean up it’s old phosphorus plant in southeastern Idaho?

FMC claims to have annual sales of approximately $3.1 billion!  Yet FMC has just completed the sale of U.S.$300 million worth of debt notes.  Why does it need to do that?  According to FMC officials they’re jumping on the new trend of Corporate America buying back their stocks.  FMC wants to buy back at least $200 million of their own shares!  Instead, shouldn’t they spend that on cleaning up their Idaho Superfund site?

Recently the Environmental Protection Agency held public meetings in southeastern Idaho, to discuss ways to clean up the old FMC site.  Capped ponds at the site are emitting toxic phosphine gas.  There was also decades of dumping before the EPA was created. There is concern that contamination is leaking into the ground water, and nearby rivers.

 

Corporate Incompetence & What Economic Recovery? Another U.S. computer company, Dell, spends big, and loses big, in Taiwan. Want to work for Dell? Move to Taiwan

Taiwan’s Ministry of Economic Affairs named U.S. based Dell their third biggest foreign buyer, after Hewlett Packard and Toshiba.

This comes after Dell was ordered (some says ‘suggested’) by the Taiwan government to honor a pricing mistake on 19 inch monitors and pricey laptop computers.  The monitors were mistakenly priced at U.S.$15.00 and the laptops at $563.40.

Dell tried to get customers to pay full price, but was threatened with a $759,000 fine by the Taiwan government.

“To avoid further confusion to our customers and to facilitate further investigation Dell has made the difficult decision to close our Taiwan online store.”-Dell statement

Dell is still trying to get the Taiwan government to let them recoup their loses, and avoid something like this in the future, after all Dell spends about $10 billion on Taiwanese made products every year!

Buy the way, if you want to work for Dell, be willing to move to Taiwan.  As of November 27, Dell has at least 40 openings in Taiwan: “Thank you for considering a career in Taiwan at Dell”