Tag Archives: corporations

Business/Economics, International, U.S.

Occupy America! U.S. Capitalist Airline industry is a big FAIL! History of bankruptcies and losses! Testimonies before Congress prove it! More proof that American Airlines can’t be trusted!

“The airline industry has the worst financial performance of any of our major business sectors. While the industry has enjoyed some profitable years, airline operators as a whole have lost money since deregulation in 1978.”– from Current Situation and Future Outlook of U.S. Commercial Airline Industry, September 28, 2005

In September 2005, the U.S. House of Representatives’ Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the Subcommittee on Aviation, heard testimonies on the economic viability of the U.S. airline industry.  It wasn’t good.

Here’s some quotes from the report:

“Historically, airlines have failed at a much higher rate than most other types of businesses.”

“In fact the U.S. airline industry has seen 150 bankruptcy filings in the last 25 years, an average of almost six per year.”

Bankruptcies don’t work because “…history has shown that the growth of airline industry capacity [a type of competition based on supply and demand] has continued unaffected even by major liquidations.”

“Over the past four years, U.S. commercial airlines have lost over $32 billion collectively and it is estimated that the industry will experience another $10 billion in loss in 2005.”

Don’t blame the September 11, 2001 attacks, the airlines were in trouble before that: “…well over 100,000 jobs have been lost in this industry since that time [the year 2000] and just recently, in concert with their announced bankruptcies…”

Don’t blame the cost of labor, like the CEO of American Airlines is doing: “Numerous factors have contributed to the problem and Mr. Kiefer mentioned some of them. I would say that three stand out in the current environment: very high jet fuel prices, intense price competition in the domestic market; and heavy debt and pension burdens.”

So they whine about fuel prices, but haven’t they been jacking up their ticket prices to cover that? They whine about competition! Isn’t competition the American Capitalist way? I think the mantra goes ‘if you can’t handle the competition then you should get out of the business’. And they whine about being in debt! You see, we individuals have been lectured for years about the sins of debt, yet the biggest debt offenders are the Corporations of America (after the Federal government)!

However, a professor from the Northeastern University Boston, and a senior fellow from the Brookings Institution, testified that in their opinion the three biggest costs to the airline industry is fuel, competition and labor.

Speaking of labor and American Airlines, the 2005 testimonies show that labor cost for the now bankrupt airline had already been reduced: “…airline employees have been asked to take substantial pay cuts, trim their benefits and in some cases, lose their jobs. Exhibit 5 in my remarks shows broad expense categories for AMR, parent of American Airlines, in 2002 and in the second quarter of 2005. Over that period labor costs declined from 41 percent of total expenses to 32 percent.”

Again, don’t blame the cost of labor: “…airlines have undertaken significant steps to trim their losses but these have so far been insufficient to restore profitability, largely because of the fuel prices.”

The nature of the industry makes it almost impossible to make a profit, it involves a lot of guessing and optimism: “The airline industry has always been a cyclical one because the demand for air travel is sensitive to the level of economic activity and carriers must invest in capacity well before they know the level of economic activity and demand.”

Airlines have always used bankruptcy to destroy union labor contracts, in the name of competition: “Legacy carriers have been cutting costs where they can and since labor is the largest category of airline costs, it has been the target
of cost cutting and enhanced productivity through negotiation as well as in bankruptcy as the legacy carriers seek to reduce costs to compete with low cost carriers.”

Some officials blamed the consumers for not being able to pay higher ticket prices, and blamed airline executives for not having the guts to pass on the true cost of fuel to their customers, again in the name of competition: “The airline industry however suffers from the burden of having to pay high prices without the flexibility of necessarily receiving higher fares. Historically, carriers have been loathe to pass on higher fuel costs in the form of any additional tariff for fear of being undercut by competition. This has led to a vicious cycle within the industry…” In other words, ticket prices haven’t gone high enough!

According to testimony from Moody’s officials, most airlines that go bankrupt don’t really change the way they do business: “Airlines operating in bankruptcy generally continue to pay airport rates and charges and in most cases do not radically downsize their operations.”

Testimony at the 2005 hearings foretold of American Airlines’ bankruptcy filing on November 29, 2011. The testimony was about what else American Airlines could do to further reduce their costs, and how to do it: Mr. MICA. “Again, pensions would still be sort of the big enchilada in obligations and fuel?”
Mr. BAGGALEY. “Actually, the largest portion of American and other airlines’ obligations are secured debt and leases. Pension deficits are significant but they are a minority of the total.”
Mr. MICA. “The only way you can restructure those would be through bankruptcy or negotiation?”
Mr. BAGGALEY. “Yes.”

Philip Baggaley, of Standard & Poor’s, also testified that many financial problems for the airline industry are “inherent” and go back before the 1990s.

Baggaley also explained that a major reason for legacy (airlines created before the 1978 deregulation) airlines filing bankruptcy was to destroy the pension (retirement) programs for their employees.  He admitted that financial institutions like to see companies destroy their employees’ retirement plans, and rewarded the companies with better credit ratings!

Baggaley also explained that wages and benefits are always the target of corporations, because it is the easiest to control.  Airline executives target labor as a way to offset the uncontrollable fuel costs. However, he showed that fuel costs have gone up so much that drastic labor cuts, without declaring bankruptcy, are no longer enough.  From 2002 to 2005 American Airlines gained, or saved, $1.8 billion in labor concessions, but they still lost $3.2 billion to fuel costs.

Baggaley also explained that while company mergers normally work for other industries, in reducing overall costs, history shows that mergers actually increase operating costs for legacy airlines.  He called it a “zero sum game”, and added that the only potential benefit for airlines filing for bankruptcy, and even merging, is that it’s a way of reducing competition: “…bankruptcy restructuring and mergers have the potential to improve the industry’s financial health, but only if accompanied by reduced capacity [a way of reducing competition] and, most important, by lowering operating costs.” Remember, competition is one of the three main reasons the airline industry is failing.

Mark Kiefer, of CRA International (economic and management consulting firm), testified that the problems with the airline industry go all the way back to the 1978 deregulation. He explained that the only time the airlines were really “profitable” was when they were being regulated by the Federal government!

Kiefer said government regulation kept ticket prices up, and limited the number of airlines allowed to operate (thus killing competition).  Since deregulation ticket prices dropped, and smaller more competitive airlines were born. Even after more than 30 years, the bigger, older (legacy) airlines just can not compete with the smaller younger Low Cost Carrier (LCC) airlines.  Under the traditional concept of capitalism, doesn’t that mean the legacy airlines should be allowed to die?

Kiefer also explained that the legacy airlines are still operating pre-deregulation when it came to wages and benefits for employees.  They tend to pay more than the LCC airlines, and offer company health and retirement benefits.  Kiefer says no LCC airline offers such benefits.  LCCs do offer “…defined contribution and profit sharing plans that have a much lower overall cost to the airline.”

Steven Morrison, Northeastern University Boston, and Clifford Winston from the Brookings Institution, say that, amazingly even after 30 years, the legacy airlines “…still needs time to adjust to its deregulatory freedoms by ridding itself of remaining cost inefficiencies…” In other words, the last hurdle to fully deregulating the legacy airlines is unionized labor.

But while the highly edjumacated college officials blamed labor for the airlines’ problems, U.S. Representative James Oberstar put the blame squarely on the legacy airlines: “Since deregulation, the legacy airlines’ revenue model has depended on extracting premium fares from a small percentage of passengers. That revenue model began to unravel in the year 2000…”

Of interest is the testimony from the executive director of the Air Carrier Association of America, Edward Faberman. Who better to explain to woes of the airline industry, and guess what, he did not blame labor!  He blamed, in order, fuel costs, homeland security costs, airport expenses, air traffic control expenses, Customs & Border Control service expenses, and finally cancelled flights.

Very interestingly, Faberman actually countered the claims of many of the experts mentioned above. Even though the airline industry was deregulated back in 1978, the legacy airlines are still getting subsidized by the government!  He basically said that in the name of competitive capitalism the big old legacy airlines should be allowed to die off, and that the LCCs should take over.

Finally, here’s what the airline officials in the United Kingdom think of the U.S. airline industry: “But America, land of the free, is turning itself into the land of the free ride. In the last four years, the airlines have soaked up $15 to $20 billion of public subsidy and loan guarantees. They’re operating in protected markets, they’re hoovering up public funds and they still can’t make a profit. They are dumping capacity on the North Atlantic, distorting competition and pricing for cash. They struggle to compete and, at some, the workforce has been demoralized. The more the government has tried to help, the worse things have become.”-Rod Eddington, CEO British Airways, September 22, 2005

 

 

 

Business/Economics, U.S.

Occupy America! Don’t blame the Unions. American Airlines’ bankruptcy is Bogus! American Airlines has $4 Billion in Cash!

On November 29 the oldest operating U.S. airline, American Airlines, filed for bankruptcy.  But before anyone gets excited, look at the facts.

The new CEO of American Airlines, Thomas Horton, blames his company’s losses on the cost of union labor.  He specifically calls union labor “cost disadvantages”.

First off, the majority of American Airlines aircraft are older fuel guzzling planes. Isn’t that a cost disadvantage?

Secondly, while American Airlines officials claim they’re losing money, they just made the largest order of new aircraft in airline history.  460 new planes ordered in July!  Isn’t making the biggest purchase of aircraft in history a cost disadvantage?

Thirdly, while claiming to be hurting for cash, American Airlines is actually sitting on billions in cash.   According to CBS News, U.S.$4 billion to be exact!  Where does Thomas Horton get off saying they have cost disadvantages?

Wouldn’t it be nice if we individuals could file for bankruptcy while sitting on a pile of cash?  Don’t blame the unions!

Business/Economics, U.S.

Occupy America, What Economic Recovery? The truth is finally told about how much the Federal Reserve spent to bail out the too big to fail banks; nearly $8 Trillion! Ron Paul is right!!!

“This is an issue that can unite the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street.”-Sherrod Brown, U.S. Senator from Ohio

Lies, scandals, cover ups, all part of the “too big to fail’s” plan to squeeze the United States dry.  Now there’s proof!

Bloomberg Markets magazine has gotten a hold of a 29,000(!) page document, that shows just how much the big banks lied and cheated to the tune of U.S.$7.77 trillion, and that’s not counting the taxpayer funded bailouts!

The bottom line is everybody close to the process lied like crazy.”-Naked Capitalism

Ever since 2007, when the Federal Reserve (a privately run bank) began bailing out the “too big to fail” banks, like Bank of America, the exact amount of the bail outs had been kept secret.  Ben Bernanke even said it was because if the public knew how much it really cost it would cause more problems.  He’s right!

While the average American in the United States lost their credit, lost their home, and lost their job, Corporate America got a $7.77 trillion bailout from the Federal Reserve. That’s a record!  And that doesn’t even count the taxpayer funded bail outs!!!

By the way, average Americans in the United States are still losing their credit, their homes and their jobs, because of bailed out Corporate America!!!

Here’s some more interesting facts about the Federal Reserve bailouts:

1; On December 5, 2008, a record $1.2 trillion was issued on one day!!! 

2; The Federal Reserve actually set up the supposed bail out “loans” so that some members of Corporate America made a profit off of paying back those loans!  How would you like to be paid for paying back your loans?  Corporate America made an estimated $13 billion off some of the bail out loans!

3; Citigroup made the most money off of the Federal Reserve loans, to the tune of $1.8 billion!

4; In fact the top U.S. banks (JPMorgan, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley) used the bail out loans to increase their power. By September 2011, their combined assets had increased to $9.5 trillion!!!

5; Most of these bail out loans were issued when the “too big to fail” banks (case in point Bank of  America and JP Morgan Chase & Company) were telling their stockholders that they were in no trouble at all!

6; Most of these bail out loans were issued at the same time that the government was giving away taxpayer dollars to save Corporate America!  Treasury Department boss Timothy Geithner was well aware of how much money the Federal Reserve was loaning to the “too big to fail’s”!

7; The U.S. Treasury Department’s taxpayer funded TARP program cost a record $700 billion, but that is now dwarfed by the newly revealed Federal Reserve bail outs.

8; The six biggest U.S. banks, got $160 billion of taxpayer TARP funds, and, as much as $460 billion from the Federal Reserve!

Bloomberg got the 29,000 page document after winning a lawsuit (amazingly) against the Federal Reserve, and the country’s biggest group of banks, know as the Clearing House Association.

What this proves is that Corporate America is one big ass FAIL!!!  Either they were in the financial hole and really did need the bail outs, which means they had already failed as Capitalist Captains of Industry, or, they were not in the hole, as they repeatedly told their stockholders, and they just pulled off the biggest scam in world history!!!

The result is that the Untied States is now toast: “…we’re absolutely, totally, 100% not prepared for another financial crisis.”-Ted Kaufman, former U.S. Senator from Delaware

Ron Paul is right!!!

 

 

Business/Economics, Idaho, U.S.

What Economic Recovery? Corporate layoffs & stock market games, part of Corporate America’s stock buy back scheme. Hewlett-Packard case in point

“We’re relatively pessimistic about the economic outlook in two of our three major regions. 2012 just looks tough to me.”-Meg Whitman, new CEO of Hewlett-Packard

“It’s an extraordinarily unimaginative way to use money.”-Robert Reich, former U.S. Secretary of Labor

What’s the former U.S. Secretary of Labor talking about? Why Corporate America buying back its own stocks.  Companies are able to do this because they are not spending money on research and development, and, according to a New York Times article, it’s the real reason companies are still laying off employees. They’re using the money they would have paid for the labor to buy back company stocks.

In November employees at the Boise, Idaho, Hewlett-Packard (HP) factory reported that layoffs were in the works.  In July HP bought back U.S.$10 billion of their own stocks, then laid off 500 employees in September.  HP officials avoided directly answering questions about layoffs in Idaho by saying they were working on a “press release”.  It’s been a couple of weeks now and no press release.

A lot of problems are being created by the way Corporate America is buying back their stocks.  For one it artificially increases the value of their stocks:  “Unless earnings per share are adjusted to reflect the buyback, then to base a bonus on raw earnings per share is problematic. It doesn’t purely reflect performance.”-John L. Weinberg, University of Delaware

Number two, it’ll delay any economic recovery: “It’s a symptom of a deeper problem, which is a lack of investment in the long term. If we’re not investing in research, innovation and entrepreneurship, we’re going to be a slow growth country for a decade.”-William W. George, Harvard Business School

And thirdly, it’s increasing unemployment, which is only adding to the downward spiral of the economy.

On November 22, Meg Witman, former eBay CEO, former California Gubernatorial candidate, and new CEO of Hewlett-Packard, was questioned about HP’s huge cuts in R&D.  Here’s her response: “It’s not (return on investment) in year one or two. I think the investments we make in 2012 you’ll start to see in 2014 and 2015. I wish I could tell you differently but it’s not true. And you’re right. We cut out a lot of muscle in R&D at this company and we have to invest back in it. It’s a long term play. I will tell you, this management team, we are now building HP, we’re building it to last. We’re not building it for next month or next quarter. We are building this company to be great over the next decade. And you’ll see improvements every single year. You’ll be able to measure us on how we’re doing. But we’re making some long term bets here because we can’t continue to run this company for the short term.”

Knowing that the latest trend in Corporate America is buying back their own stock, at the expense of R&D and employment, is that what Whitman means when she says “…we’re making some long term bets…”?

Whitman’s answer is confusing.  Traditional economics tells you that investing in R&D is a long term “bet”.  Yet Whitman calls it “short term”. 

So is that what Whitman means when she says we should see returns on investment in 2014/2015?  The investment meaning buying back their own stocks?

Anyone who’s taken economics, or business courses should know that traditional investment into your own company means R&D; to come up with more efficient ways to produce products, or coming up with new products/services, better marketing, etc.  But it does not mean buying back your own stocks.

Perhaps stock buybacks are the real reason there are layoffs coming for HP’s Boise operation, and officials are still trying to come up with a good sounding reason for their forthcoming “press release”?

Hopefully, since Whitman just started her job as HP CEO, she’s talking about a return to traditional economics. Hopefully it’ll mean an end to HP’s stock buy backs and a return to putting money into R&D and employment, she did say: “We cut out a lot of muscle in R&D at this company and we have to invest back in it.” Oh well, wishful thinking.

 

Business/Economics, International, U.S.

Revised GDP report; what the mainstream media doesn’t tell you, inflation up, military spending up, non-military spending down, workers producing more but not being paid more

On November 22, the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) released another revised Real GDP report.  It says the second revision of GDP for the third quarter 2011 was a stagnant 2%.

Gross Domestic Product is the “the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States”.   Real GDP means it’s been adjusted for inflation, specifically: “‘Real’ estimates are in chained (2005) dollars.”

The BEA report has some other important information, that the mainstream media rarely reports.

Inflation: Overall prices increased 1.9% in the third quarter, and 3.3% in the second quarter.

Expenses: Overall consumption expenditures increased 2.3% in the third quarter, 0.7% in the second quarter.

Property Investment: Non-residential property investment increased 14.8% in the third quarter, 10.3% in the second quarter.  Residential property investment increased 1.6% in the third quarter, 4.2% in the second quarter.

Exports: Products made in the U.S. and shipped to other countries increased 4.3% in the third quarter,  3.6% in the second.

Imports: Products brought into the U.S. increased 0.5% in the third quarter, 1.4% in the second quarter.

Government: Federal spending on the military increased 4.7% in the third quarter,  7.0% in the second. Federal spending on non-military decreased 3.8% in the third quarter, decreasing 7.6% in the second. State and local spending decreased 1.4% in the third quarter, decreasing 2.8% in the second.

Production: Real Gross National Product increased 2.1% in the third quarter, and 2.2% in the second.

Value of Products Produced: Market value increased 4.6% in the third quarter, 4.0% in the second quarter.

Income: Real Gross Domestic Income increased 0.4% in the third quarter, and 0.2% in the second.

To be significant the amount of change should be 3% or greater. Between 0% and 3% should be considered stagnation, below 0% is retraction.

Notice the huge jumps in property investment.

Notice that U.S. exports are above 3%.  This corresponds to the increase in production.  The value of products produced are more than 4%!  Yet look at the income of U.S. workers, a 0.4% pittance!  Some reward for making more products and providing more service!

The BEA’s data on production and income shows you that Corporate America views labor as slave wage workers. After all it’s obviously not the workers who’re benefiting from the increased production, and the increased value of their products and services!

What about government spending of your tax dollars? The BEA report shows what many are dealing with, a drop in State and local government spending (social services and education are the big ones), and a huge drop (more than 7% in the 2nd quarter, more than 3% in the 3rd) in Federal non-military spending (again, social programs, education, etc).  But look at the huge jump in military spending, it almost matches the cuts in non-military spending!

The BEA’s data on government spending is a real indicator of who the government really cares about!

Business/Economics, International, U.S.

Corporate Incompetence: British MF Global following in footsteps of Japanese Olympus?

“I’m flabbergasted. The bottom line is, there’s going to be a haircut involved. It’s devastating, what this has done to the industry.”-Tom Ward, retired Chicago Board of Trade member whose two sons have been blocked from accessing their money

Officials with MF Global, formerly Man Financial, are now admitting that they lost much more money than first reported. They’re now saying they lost $1.2 billion!

“What did the CFTC know three weeks ago and what do they know now?  If the amount has changed that much over three weeks, where did the money go? What were (regulators) looking at before?”-Tim Butler, attorney representing group of MF Global customers

MF Global originated in England, but after several moves, ended up in New York City in 2009.  They were a primary trader of U.S. sovereign debt (bonds).

Regulators have taken over the company, and are now liquidating it. The process has frozen $5.45 billion of customers’ money!

MF Global says they lost the money making a bad trade deal with the very bonds they deal with!  The latest reports say that MF Global may have used its customers’ investment money to make the deals for itself, a violation of regulations.

Investors are trying to get their money back, so far it takes hiring an attorney, but not everyone can do that: “Unlike the big banks, the average farmer who lost money in this fiasco can’t afford to hire an attorney and attend proceedings in a Manhattan courtroom.”-Chuck Grassley, U.S. Senator from Iowa

MF Global filed bankruptcy on October 31.

 

Business/Economics, U.S.

Occupy the United Police States of America! Officials admit to arresting reporters, restraining order ignored by cops, even a retired Judge was threatend by cops

“I was there to take down the names of people who were arrested. As I’m standing there, some African-American woman goes up to a police officer and says, ‘I need to get in. My daughter’s there. I want to know if she’s OK.’ And he said, ‘Move on, lady.’  And they kept pushing with their sticks, pushing back. And she was crying.  And all of a sudden, out of nowhere, he throws her to the ground and starts hitting her in the head.  I walk over, and I say, ‘Look, cuff her if she’s done something, but you don’t need to do that.’  And he said, ‘Lady, do you want to get arrested?’  And I said, ‘Do you see my hat? I’m here as a legal observer.’  He said, ‘You want to get arrested?’  And he pushed me up against the wall.”-Karen Smith, retired New York State Supreme Court Judge, and official legal observer of the OWS movement

New York City cops threatening to take down an official legal observer, and retired judge, just because she was reminding them of what they legally can and can not do.  If this isn’t proof that the United States has become a true Police State, then you’re blind!!!

Here’s more proof of the arrogance of “our” leaders: “Not being familiar with many of the media outlets for which The Awl says these reporters work, I had the list of ‘26 arrested reporters’ checked against the roster of reporters who hold valid NYPD press passes. You can imagine my surprise when we found that only five of the 26 arrested reporters actually have valid NYPD issued press credentials.”-Stu Loeser, NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s spokesperson

First off, he admits 26 reporters were intentionally arrested for covering OWS events. Secondly, the list of 26 reporters includes many arrested at OWS events outside New York, so why would they have New York press credentials?!

Some examples: Photojournalist Kristyna Wentz-Graff, arrested in Milwaukee!  Reporter Jonathan Meador, arrested in Tennessee! Why do they need New York press credentials?

The British The Guardian reports that even a reporter with United Nations credentials was arrested.

Examples of harassment: Julie Walker, of NPR, says cops ripped her recorder out of her hands.  Doug Higginbotham, from New Zealand, had his New York press ID stripped off him by the NYPD.

Most arrested reporters are being let go, but some are being charged with disorderly conduct.

If you’re wounder how to get a New York City press credential, here’s a quote from the NYPD web site: “Applicants also must submit one or more articles, commentaries, books, photographs, videos, films or audios published or broadcast within the twenty–four (24) months immediately preceding the Press Card application, sufficient to show that the applicant covered in person six (6) or more events occurring on separate days.”

Did you notice; in order to get New York City press credentials you have to already be reporting, apparently illegally, news about New York City!!!  That’s typical Police State mentality.

On top of all that, the OWS movement actually got a restraining order against the NYPD, but the cops, and city officials ignored it: “When the cops raided Zuccotti Park, lawyers for Occupy Wall Street immediately woke up a judge with a civil liberties background and asked for help.  Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Lucy Billings signed an early-morning order temporarily barring cops from keeping protesters and tents out of Zuccotti Park.  But within hours, she was off the case as court administrators prepared to randomly choose a new judge — and excluded Billings’ name from the list of candidates.”-The New York Daily News

 

 

 

Business/Economics, U.S.

Occupy America! Where are the 1%? California, New York, Texas, Florida & Illinois

So just where do the 1% of the richest people in the United States live?

According to Wealth-X, California is number one, followed by New York, Texas, Florida and Illinois.

10,390 UHNW (ultra high net worth) individuals officially live in California.  8,215 in New York, 5,550 in Texas, 3,615 in Florida and 2,680 in Illinois.  These top five home states of the 1% represent at least 50% of the wealth in the United States!

Business/Economics, International, U.S.

Occupy the World! Forget the 1%, what about the 0.000003% who control most of the World’s wealth?

Three millionths of a percent, that’s how many people throughout the world actually control the majority of the wealth.

According to a survey by Wealth-X (a Singapore based company that serves the interests of the ultra-rich, it says so on their web site) most of the world’s wealth is held by only 0.000003% of the people!

Ultra high net worth (UHNW) individuals are people with $30 million or more in assets.  That means real wealth, not wealth that’s ‘on paper’.  Wealth-X says there are only 185,795 UHNW people globally!  Of that, only 1,235 people are true billionaires!

Wealth-X breaks it down for the United States: 57,860 UHNWs, 455 of which are true billionaires. This means that of the 1% in the U.S., 1/54th controls 13.5% of the country’s wealth!

For Europe there are 54,325 UHNWs, in Asia there are 42,525 UHNWs, and 15,100 UHNWs in Latin America. Interestingly there’s nothing about ultra wealthy in Africa or the Middle East.

The Wealth-X survey is titled A Wealthy Head Count.