I did some research to find out what was going on, and apparently there are two major problems taking place involving the USDA SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, originally known as Food Stamps): 1; many states are overwhelmed with SNAP applications, some states as much as four months behind, 2; the extra Pandemic SNAP funding is about to end in February/March (depending on the news source), and some states have already ended the Pandemic funding (like Idaho)!
For those of you who don’t know, each U.S. state handles the federal SNAP program differently, some states have very liberal programs while others are very tight fisted.
There doesn’t seem to be an explanation for the SNAP application backlog, but some states are having no problem spending tax dollars hiring security guards for their Social Services operations. The fact that the extra Pandemic funding for SNAP is coming to an end indicates the federal government thinks the Pandemic is over.
Here are links to local news reports/videos (tip-o-the-iceberg) about the SNAP shenanigans taking place across the United States:
8 News Now: Thousands of people in sparsely populated Nevada losing SNAP assistance!
9 News: More than half a million Coloradans hit by SNAP cuts!
A plastic surgeon in Utah is accused of intentionally destroying $28-thousand worth of mRNA vaccines for children, and then issuing false vaccination documents! Several other people, and the Plastic Surgery Institute of Utah, are facing the same accusations.
The specific charge was announced on 18JAN2023, it is conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to convert, sell, convey, and dispose of government property, conversion sale, conveyance, and disposal of government property and aiding and abetting.
26 January 2023 (12:29-UTC-07 Tango 06) 06 Bahman 1401/04 Rajab 1444/05 Gui-Chou 4721/26 январь 2023 года
The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has ranked 10 of Idaho’s 80 nursing home operators as ‘worst’, and one nursing home has so many violations it didn’t make any ranking!
The CMS looks at data from health inspections, staffing levels, and the vague sounding ‘quality measures’ which I suspect means quality of care. You can go to the Medicare.gov ‘Find and Compare Providers near you’ website and enter the name and state of the nursing home to see their ‘star rating’, the 11 losers are:
Caldwell Care of Cascadia
Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society – Silver Wood Village
Ivy Court (for abuse)
Coeur d’Alene Life Care Center of Post Falls (for abuse and under Special Focus Facility Program)
Post Falls Prestige Care & Rehabilitation
Lewiston Royal Plaza Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia
Lewiston Silver Ridge Care
Coeur d’Alene Skyline Transitional Care Center (for abuse)
Boise Twin Falls Transitional Care of Cascadia (for abuse)
08 January 2023 (23:21-UTC-07 Tango 06) 18 Dey 1401/15 Jumada t-Tania 1444/17 Xin-Chou 4720/08 январь 2023 года
“…melioidosis is considered a high-priority potential biological threat agent; its close relative Burkholderia mallei was used as a bioweapon during World War I. Research on this pathogen requires high-containment laboratories (biosafety level 3, or BSL-3). There is no vaccine, and treatment with antibiotics is lengthy and difficult because of the bacterium’s inherent antibiotic resistance—it is ‘impervious to all but a few antibiotics.'”–Melioidosis Modeling: Research to Support Countermeasures for a Tricky Pathogen, U.S. Food and Drug Administration
The bacteria is called Burkholderia Pseudomallei, it causes something called Melioidosis (aka Whitmore’s Disease) in both animals and humans. Up until now, it was mainly found in northern Australia and South East Asia.
The American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, along with the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), are claiming that six cases have popped-up in the United States as a result of monkeys being imported from the South East Asian country of Cambodia: “…animals infected with B. pseudomallei may appear healthy for months to years before showing signs of illness, during which time they can shed the organism into the environment. Melioidosis presents diagnostic challenges because it causes nonspecific clinical signs, serologic screening can produce unreliable results, and culture isolates are often misidentified on rapid commercial testing systems. Here, we present a case of melioidosis in a cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis) that developed a subcutaneous abscess after importation from Cambodia to the United States.”–Melioidosis in Cynomolgus Macaques ( Macaca Fascicularis ) Imported to the United States from Cambodia
Burkholderia Pseudomallei ( aka B-Pseudomallei, or Pseudomonas Pseudomallei) is a bacteria found in soil or water. Only in 2006 did scientist begin to understand the virulence of the Melioidosis disease it causes: “…and the study of host–pathogen interactions has shed some light on pathogenic mechanisms, but many key questions await investigation…”-Melioidosis: insights into the pathogenicity of Burkholderia pseudomallei
08 January 2023 (22:28-UTC-07 Tango 06) 18 Dey 1401/15 Jumada t-Tania 1444/17 Xin-Chou 4720/08 январь 2023 года
Scientists working in the African country of Uganda have discovered that a tick-borne hemorrhagic fever, that normally affects farm animals, has made the jump to humans! The study, published 07JAN2023, was spurred by the death of a cattle seller.
Basically, the scientists are warning that sporadic cases of fatal human hemorrhagic fever in Uganda are caused by what used to be a disease that was associated with livestock. They found antibodies to CCHF in both livestock and humans. They are asking government administrators to establish CCHF monitoring specifically around farms, and cattle/goat herding routes.
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), CCHF can be found on the African continent, The Middle East (South West Asia), and Central Asia.
05 January 2023 (20:42-UTC-07 Tango 06) 15 Dey 1401/12 Jumada t-Tania 1444/14 Xin-Chou 4720/05 январь 2023 года
The United States has the underutilized Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). In the United Kingdom it is officially called Yellow Card, because when the program was started people had to manually fill out yellow cards to report their adverse reaction to a vaccine. Both the U.S. and U.K.’s voluntary system relies mainly on the victim to file the report, but healthcare providers can also file reports.
The U.K.’s Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has published the latest numbers (23NOV2022, published on 21DEC2022) regarding adverse reactions. Notice below that the number of voluntarily reported reactions add up to more than 400-thousand!
Table 4: Number of reports
Country
COVID-19 Pfizer/ BioNTech Vaccine (monovalent and bivalent)
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca
COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna (monovalent and bivalent)
Brand unspecified
England
138,610
203,063
37,408
1,214
Wales
8,628
10,922
2,841
114
Northern Ireland
3,087
3,020
202
27
Scotland
13,254
17,608
3,891
239
The MHRA report also goes into detail about the reactions, including deadly reactions, and the demographics of the people affected.
Table 11: Number of UK reports with a fatal outcome received for COVID-19 Vaccines by patient age up to and including 23 November 2022
05 January 2023 (09:46-UTC-07 Tango 06) 15 Dey 1401/12 Jumada t-Tania 1444/14 Xin-Chou 4720/05 январь 2023 года
Maybe I’m reading these studies wrong, but it seems like they are burying some important data within their text.
A study, published on 02JAN2023 in Nature Microbiology, gave some conflicting statements, recommending a third dose of mRNA vaccine, yet their own data shows what to me is a high rate of infection for U.S. veterans after the third dose! The researchers looked at medical records of tens of thousands of U.S. veterans, with a median age of 70, the overwhelming majority men, who got a third vaccination from 20OCT2021 to 08FEB2022.
BNT162b2 = Pfizer
mRNA-1273 = Moderna
Under the heading Comparative effectiveness, the study said that after a third dose of mRNA vaccines, veterans had an “estimated” risk factor of 95% for infection (353.9 ‘events’ per 10-thousand veterans for Pfizer, 308.5 ‘events’ per 10-thousand veterans for Moderna). Many got hospitalized and some even died: “As expected, we found a nearly identical risk pattern in the two vaccine groups in the evaluations of two negative outcome controls: symptomatic COVID-19 during the first 7 d after the third vaccine dose…and death from causes other than COVID-19 during follow-up.”-Comparative effectiveness of third doses of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines in US veterans
In the graphic below, the solid black line represents Pfizer, while the broken beige line is Moderna. It shows ‘documented’ infections, ‘symptomatic’ meaning infection with visible symptoms, hospitalizations, Intensive Care (ICU), and deaths, over a four months (16 weeks) period after the individuals got their third mRNA immunization.
“Over a 16-week-follow-up, 2,994 SARS-CoV-2 infections were documented, of which 200 were detected as symptomatic COVID-19 within the VA healthcare system, 194 required hospitalization, 52 required ICU admission and 22 resulted in death.”
A secondary 9 week analysis was done, between January and March 2022, with different veterans, with similar results.
Interestingly the study concludes by saying a third dose is highly effective and that “either vaccine is strongly recommended to any individual. This study provides evidence of clear and comparable benefits of these vaccines…” but then admits “Further evaluation of the comparative effectiveness and safety of additional doses of these vaccines is needed.” Is a 95% risk of infection now considered low risk?
04 January 2023 (16:54-UTC-07 Tango 06) 14 Dey 1401/11 Jumada t-Tania 1444/13 Xin-Chou 4720/04 январь 2023 года
“The strengths of our study include its large sample size, and its conduct in a healthcare system where a very early recognition of the critical importance of maintaining an effective workforce during the pandemic led to devotion of resources to have an accurate accounting of who had COVID-19, when COVID-19 was diagnosed, who received a COVID-19 vaccine, and when. The study methodology, treating bivalent vaccination as a time-dependent covariate, allowed for determining vaccine effectiveness in real time.”–Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine
In a ‘pre-print’ not yet peer reviewed study (released on 19DEC2022), a massively huge tracking of vaccinated versus not vaccinated people (51-thousand-11 people in total, that is big) by the Cleveland Clinic, in the U.S. state of Ohio, implied that if you want to avoid CoViD, then to have your best chances you need to avoid immunizations!
The intro of the study appears to be slightly pro-vaccine, claiming boosters are weak at only 30% effectiveness (at best). However, it is when you read the details of the study that it becomes painfully obvious that the study directly blames high rates of continued infections on the mRNA vaccines themselves!
Buried in the study is a section titled Risk of COVID-19 based on prior infection and vaccination history. The accompanying chart shows that those who are vaccinated have the highest risk of infection!
This chart clearly shows that people with zero mRNA vaccinations have the lowest risk of infection, while the people with the most vaccinations/boosters have the highest risk of infection! Again, this was buried in the study, just a quick glance over the study would make you think it was pro-booster.
While the authors continue to state that Bivalent boosters are 30% effective, they admit that their study showed having the booster, on top of the original immunizations, also increases your risk of infection by as much as “3.5 times”!
The study concludes that boosters are only moderately effective, and that “The effect of multiple COVID-19 vaccine doses on future risk of COVID-19 needs further study.”
26 December 2022 (11:51-UTC-07 Tango 06) 05 Dey 1401/02 Jumada t-Tania 1444/04 Ren-Zi (12th month)4720/26 Декабрь 2022 года
Ever hear of the non-governmental organization (NGO) EcoHealth Alliance? Most people haven’t, but on 06DEC2022 a former vice president of the NGO released a ‘tell-all’ book about how taxpayer funded EcoHealth Alliance was directly involved with gain-of-function at the Wuhan Lab in China!
EcoHealth Alliance was founded by a United Kingdom born scientist who has a passion for what we now know of as Gain-of-Function; the intentional laboratory manipulation of natural diseases to make them more powerful. The excuse has always been that by doing so you could prepare for a disease’s natural evolution (mutation) into new strains. This has never been proven!
Peter Daszak not only founded EcoHealth Alliance, but is still the current president. The NGO is based in New York City. Daszak helped the Wuhan Lab get U.S. taxpayer funding, yet adamantly denied his organization was doing anything wrong. However, just days after the book The Truth About Wuhan was released, Daszak proudly published photos and videos of he and his EcoHealth Alliance team capturing bats in Thailand.
09DEC2022 video:
In the heart of the bat cave – deafening noise as the bats swirl around. It’s the sheer beauty of nature & at the same time it seems like the “reactor core” of the colony given what we know about viral emergence. Ratchaburi Cave 2.5 million bats. pic.twitter.com/jTDN1oDSVU
In October 2022, the U.S. National Academy of Medicine (NAM) claimed there was no evidence that Daszak had violated their ‘code of conduct’. Realize that gain-of-function does not violate most scientific codes of conduct!
Some states suddenly end, early, Pandemic funding for Food!
FLORIDA CALLS FOR GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION! MATHEMATICIAN SHOWS YOU HOW ‘EFFICACY’ CLAIMS ARE NOTHING BUT PANDEMIC PERFIDY!
U.S. CDC CONFIRMS, IMMUNIZED PEOPLE TOP PANDEMIC DEATHS!
