Category Archives: Business/Economics

World War 3: Iran shoots down U.S. unmanned aerial vehicle, China says it will support Iran even if it means the Third World War, part of recent moves towards War

“Iran’s military has shot down an intruding RQ-170 American drone in eastern Iran.”-Iranian government statement

In the early morning hours on December 4 (U.S. time), the Iranian military shot down a U.S. unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV).  The U.S. RQ-170 Sentinel stealth drone is used for intelligence, surveillance and for target acquisition.

An unnamed Iranian military official said Iran will take action against all foreign UAVs, even those outside Iran’s borders: “…the operational and electronic measures taken by the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Armed Forces against invading aircraft will not remain limited to Iran’s borders.”

This is part of a quickening pace of actions on all sides that look like war is inevitable.

Just before Iran shot down the U.S. UAV, officials with the People’s Liberation Army National Defense University (China’s equivalent to any of the U.S. military academies) announced full military support of Iran: “China will not hesitate to protect Iran even with a Third World War.”-Major General Zhang Zhaozhong

Just this past week the U.S. Treasury Department asked all nations to stop buying oil from Iran (a futile move I pointed out).  If anyone really knows the ‘why’ of why Japan attacked the United States on December 7, 1941, it is because the U.S. stopped all oil sales to Japan. At that time the U.S. was the world’s main supplier of oil.

Just a few days ago the Japanese government responded to the current request from the U.S. Treasury by saying that out of necessity they can not stop buying Iranian oil.  Currently nearly 10% of the oil Japan gets comes from Iran. With more than 80% of their nuclear power plants off line, Japan’s need for petroleum is skyrocketing: “We need to be very careful in making such a decision, given that our priority is securing energy supply in the aftermath of the massive earthquake.”-statement from Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs

I also pointed out that the result of such an oil ban would actually hurt us little guys: “As soon as such an issue is raised seriously the oil price would soar to above $250 a barrel.”-Ramin Mehmanparast, Iran’s Foreign Ministry

Also in the past week, the United Kingdom cut off all diplomatic ties with Iran, after Iranian protestors took control of the British Embassy in Tehran (on November 29, U.S. time).  This despite the  fact that Iranian police arrested at least 12 of the protestors, and Iran officially apologized. Western governments, and media refused to report the apology but Spanish officials confirmed it:  “He said he was aware that it had violated the Vienna Convention and for that reason he was passing on to his apologies.”-Trinidad Jimenez, Foreign Minister of Spain

Even British officials admitted that Iran apologized, but said they didn’t care: “…this remains a very serious failure by the Iranian government.”-William Hague, Foreign Secretary of the United Kingdom

U.S. Vice President, Joe Biden, said there’s no proof that the Iranian government was behind the U.K. embassy take over: “I don’t have any indication how and or if it was orchestrated.”

The U.K. has thrown out all Iranian diplomats in Britain, and Iran has now done the same with British diplomats.

Norway also closed their embassy in Tehran, temporarily. They re-opened their embassy on December 1.

On December 1, former Assistant Counsel of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, Franklin Lamb, said Iran was being set up for inevitable war: “The other side (the UK) is provoking them (Iranian government). Hopefully the Tehran government will not fall in some of these traps that I think are being laid for it in a very dangerous way.”

On December 3, Iraqi Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki, said he would not allow the U.S. to use Iraq as a base for attacking Iran: “Clearly we are no enemy to Iran and we do not accept that some who have problems with Iran would use us as a battlefield.”

Recently al-Maliki was the target of an assassination bomb.

On December 2, U.S. Defense Secretary, Leon Panetta, said Iran is “a very grave threat to all of us”, and, any threat to the shipping of oil out of the Persian Gulf was the “red line” that would cause the U.S. to attack Iran.  Iran has warned that if they are threatened they will close the Strait of Hormuz, blocking all shipping from the Persian Gulf.

Also on Decmber 2, Russia’s ambassador to the United Nations, and current Security Council President, Vitaly Churkin, said the latest IAEA report on Iran’s nuclear program was a trick, because Iran was actually cooperation on the nuclear issue: “We thought that we were on the verge of restarting those talks on the basis of our proposals, because we started receiving some encouraging signals, substantive signals from the Iranian side…”

On December 1, the U.S. Senate passed, yet again, new sanctions against Iran, this time targeting the banks of Iran, and any foreign or U.S. banks doing business with Iran.

Also on December 1, the European Union passed new sanctions against 37 Iranian individuals and 143 companies/organizations from Iran, or doing business with Iran.

In response to the latest sanctions, Russia and China warned the West: “We hope the countries involved will keep calm, rational and restrained to avoid emotional actions.”-Hong Lei, Chinese Foreign Ministry

“We speak out categorically against cranking up a spiral of tension and confrontation on issues linked with Iran. We believe that this…is fraught with severe consequences.”-Alexander Lukashevich, Russian Foreign Ministry

And all these statements and events took place in just the past week.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Global Economic War: CELAC holds first summit meeting, the U.S. & Canada are not invited! “Death sentence” for the United States! IMF begging CELAC for money to bail out Europe. Get ready for Second Falkland Islands War!

“This is the achievement after 200 years of battle…The [U.S.] Monroe Doctrine was imposed here: America for Americans, the Yankees. They imposed their will during 200 years, but that’s enough…As the years go by, CELAC is going to leave behind the old and worn out OAS! [U.S. controlled Organization of American States]-Hugo Chavez, President of Venezuela, December 3, 2011

“Today, we are going to give a death sentence to the Monroe Doctrine…that battle is culminating today with the creation of CELAC.”-Daniel Ortega, President of Nicaragua, December 3, 2011

CELAC was formed in February 2010.  On December 3rd, 2011, they held their first official meeting, and the Chinese were overjoyed: “I’d like to send my warmest congratulations. China is always looking to approach its ties with Latin America and the Caribbean from a strategic perspective and is willing to deepen dialogue, exchanges and cooperation.”-Hu Jintao, President of China, December 3, 2011

CELAC stands for Comunidad de Estados Latinoamericanos y Caribeños, or Community of Latin American and Caribbean States.  CELAC is made up of 33 countries from the America’s and Caribbean. It now dominates North and South American economic policies. The United States, Canada, and the European countries were intentionally left out.

“A union of Latin American countries is the weapon against imperialism. It is necessary to create a regional body that excludes the United States and Canada …therefore, it is the best time for prime ministers of Latin America and the Caribbean to gestate this great new organization without the United States to free our peoples in Latin America and the Caribbean.”-Evo Morales, President of Bolivia, February 2010

Even supposed South American allies of the U.S. are involved: “This is in our interest, not against the OAS or Iberoamerican Summit, this is integration between Latin America and the Caribbean. I laud the meeting as a step in the right direction for Latin America.”-Juan Manuel Santos, President of Colombia, December 3, 2011

The Mexican President, Felipe Calderón, had the honor of opening the CELAC summit with the first speech: “Today we continue in a long process that never before had managed to achieve the integration of Latin American and Caribbean countries!”

Almost 30 years ago Argentina lost a war to take back the Falkland Islands from the United Kingdom.  The islands are called the Malvinas in Argentina, and at Saturday’s first CELAC summit there was unanimous support for Argentina’s continued diplomatic efforts to take back the Malvinas: “The Argentine government has shown a permanently constructive attitude and willingness to reach, via negotiations, a peaceful and definitive solution to this anachronistic, colonial situation on American soil.”-CELAC declaration

The issue of the Falklands/Malvinas is even more serious as major oil reserves have been discovered there.

In a twist of irony, it’s been revealed that the U.S. controlled International Monetary Fund (IMF) has approached CELAC for loans to help bailout Europe!  Normally countries south of the U.S. border have always been stereotyped as beggars waiting for hand out loans from the IMF:  “This time, the IMF did not come to bring money but to ask for money! I would prefer to be a creditor than a debtor.”-Guido Mantega, Finance Minister of Brazil

“It seems like the tables have been turned. Latin American finance ministers used to shudder when IMF officials came to the region. And they were scolded, they were berated by IMF officials, who told them the way to do things… Now they’re the model of fiscal discipline and responsibility.”-Michael Shifter, Inter-American Dialogue

The President of the IMF, Christine Lagarde, was in Brazil, just before the CELAC summit in Venezuela. She admitted CELAC was the economic boss now: “It’s often the case that when one part of the world is not doing so well, the other ones are going to drive the bus and take the global economy forward.” 

 

 

Government Incompetence & Global Economic War: U.S. wants other countries to stop buying Iranian oil, U.S. conspiracy to drive up the price of oil

The U.S. Treasury Department is asking other countries to stop buying Iranian oil, as part of increasing sanctions against Iran.

Here’s the problem: Iran has already adjusted its oil business so that sanctions don’t have any affect. They don’t take the U.S. dollar anymore (the real reason U.S. officials want to attack Iran), and they even let countries pay for oil purchases with barter (by trading for other petroleum related products/services). If enough countries stop taking Iranian oil it will only drive up the price of oil for everyone!  In fact, just the U.S. Treasury Department suggesting this will cause market oil prices to go up.

Who’s side is our government on anyway?

What Economic Recovery? Idaho’s unemployed, and underemployed at record levels. More proof that college is a waste of money! And stop moving here, there are not enough jobs for you!

“It would scare the citizens to death and it would make the government look bad. The government wants to look as good as it can.”-Monte Munn, economics professor at Idaho’s Treasure Valley Community College

Munn is talking about the underemployment numbers, revealed in quarterly U-6 reports: “U-6 is a lot more accurate. U-3 greatly underestimates, or understates the real unemployment.”

Monthly unemployment numbers are called U-3, but underemployment is reported every quarter (along with the unemployment numbers) and is called U-6.

As far as the U-6 numbers go, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports a seasonally adjusted October 2011 result of 16.2% for the whole country.  Idaho ranks in at 15.9% (according to overall 3rd quarter results)!

(The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics calls the ‘U’ measurments “Alternative Measures of Labor Underutilization”. Get it? ‘U’ for underutilization.)

Local Idaho media has been reporting fractional drops in a few monthly unemployment reports for 2011, but, when you look at the IDL’s U-6 yearly percentages, from 2008 to 2010, it’s clear both unemployment and underemployment have gone way up, and the few fractional monthly drops this year don’t mean a thing.

Underemployment numbers not only reveal how many people are working in jobs that don’t have benefits, or jobs that don’t match their level of education or training, but it also reveals the overall quality of jobs available.

The Idaho Department of Labor (IDL) admitted in a 2007 report, they can not count all college educated workers who’re underemployed, which means the actual numbers could be bigger: “…the number of employed job seekers with education who are looking for work is underestimated. Only those who have come through a Labor Department local office are counted, and clearly other employed workers with degrees are looking for better jobs but not through the Labor Department system.”-IDL, Measuring Underemployment in Idaho

 

Pocatello, Southeastern region of Idaho

The IDL just released U-6 data from 2008 to 2010.  By region South Central Idaho has a U-6 ranking of 20.8% making it the number one place for sucky jobs! Eastern Idaho comes in second at 18.3%!  Southeastern Idaho (where I live) joins North Idaho and North Central Idaho in the 14 percentile range.  Southwestern Idaho has the lowest U-6 at 11.7% (still bad).

The IDL even breaks it down by county, so if you want to see how bad your county is (and some counties have U-6 in the 20 percentile range!), then check it out for yourself.

An eastern Idaho TV station interviewed an IDL official, to get his take on why such high U-6 numbers. He blamed the high number of college edjumacated Idahoans, that right, too many highly qualified people living in Idaho: “…I think you would see more of our workers are underemployed, especially if they are zip code attached, where they want to stay here than to get paid more for their education elsewhere.”-Will Jenson, IDL economist

By “zip code attached” Jenson means Idahoans who go to college, find out they prefer the quality of life in Idaho and do not want to leave (I’m in that boat). However, there are very few jobs in Idaho that can pay enough to help you pay back the cost of your college degree.  The fact that there are so many highly educated people in Idaho should attract companies that need higher skilled workers, but, obviously from the U-6 numbers, it isn’t.

There’s another problem, that will eventually bring down the quality of life here in Idaho, people are flooding into the state.  According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the 2010 census count revealed that Idaho is the 4th fastest growing state in the country, at 21.1%.  Come on people, move somewhere else, there aren’t enough jobs here, let alone good paying jobs, for all you all.

As far as unemployed people getting unemployment help (insultingly called “benefits”!), according to the IDL, 11,800 Idahoans stopped receiving unemployment help this year.  Merry Xmas!

 

Corporate Incompetence: Could demise of Hewlett Packard’s WebOS end hundreds of jobs in Idaho? HP in bed with Microsoft? We’ll find out in two weeks

“We should announce our decision in the next two weeks. This is not an easy decision, because we have a team of 600 people which is in limbo.”-Meg Whitman, CEO Hewlett Packard

French media interviewed Hewlett Packard’s latest CEO, Meg Whitman.  She says what they decide to do with their WebOS system will affect at least 600 HP employees.

Other media reports confirmed that 525 layoffs, made back in September, were the result of ending WebOS hardware production.  Since August the system has been up for sale, no takers so far.

It’s strange because as recently as July, Stephen DeWitt, head of the WebOS business unit, claimed that WebOS was so versatile that it could be used in a “universe of devices”.

What happened? Executives at HP have decided to use Microsoft’s Windows 8 operating system. In explaining the embracing of Windows 8 Whitman also explained why they canceled their number two selling tablet, the TouchPad: “Internet tablets are mainly used to consume media and e-mails. If you want to use productivity software such as Microsoft, you can not…This is an important area in which we want to go.”  “We stopped using the products that use the operating system WebOS. We will return in 2012. We will have an internet tablet that will use Microsoft Windows 8.”

The new HP tablet that runs on Window 8 is called Slate 2.

Whitman also talked about the high turnover of HP CEOs, and her plans with the company: “HP has had three CEOs in less than two years.  I’m here to stay. Even if my friend Mitt Romney becomes the next president of the United States, I will not join him in Washington.”  “We must invest more in storage, networks and servers to align ourselves with our competitors like EMC and Cisco. Our last server, which uses an ARM processor is more efficient in terms of energy consumption. We need these major innovations to differentiate ourselves.”

In November unnamed sources at HP’s, Boise, Idaho operations leaked word of more layoffs.  Between 3,000 and 4,000 people work at HP’s Boise facilities.  Could the demise of WebOS have anything to do with it?  According to the French newspaper, Le Figaro, Whitman said the world will find out in two weeks.

Corporate Incompetence: Hewlett Packard gets downgraded, Idaho still waiting for official job layoffs announcement

“Major strategic reversals” is one reason why Standard & Poor’s just downgraded Hewlett Packard’s credit rating.

S&P’s also blamed HP’s inconsistent behavior: “We have concerns that HP’s inconsistent growth strategies and high levels of board of director and senior management turnover have elevated the level of operational and execution risk in the near term.”-Martha Toll-Reed, Standard & Poor’s

I’ve written about some of HP’s hypocritical behavior, like laying off hundreds of U.S. employees, buying back millions of dollars worth of their own stocks, then investing billions into their Taiwan operations, and hiring hundreds of employees in Taiwan.

Another dumb move was cancelling production of their TouchPad tablet. Turns out it was the number two selling tablet in the U.S.!

It’s been revealed that HP just spent U.S.$11.7 billion to buy a British software company called Autonomy.  $6 billion of that was in cash!!! Couldn’t HP have used that money to keep U.S. workers employed, or improve their products (they really need to)?

Back at the beginning of November someone at their Boise, Idaho, operation leaked that more layoffs were coming.  Officially HP is working on a press release to explain it. It’s the start of December now, and still no press release.

S&P’s has downgraded HP’s credit rating to BBB+.

Voter Incompetence: Obama supporter blind to Obama’s stance on shutting down the U.S. Postal Service

At a recent Obama rally in Scranton, Pennsylvania, a blind faith Obama supporter asked the President about stopping postal processing center closings, because the closings would have drastic affects on local economies.

The response: “Let me look into it.”-Barack Obama, President of the United States

This is not a case of Obama not knowing the issue, rather it’s a case of Obama blowing off a blind faith supporter who doesn’t realize that Obama is all for the closings!

Back in September Obama issued his official suggestions for how to deal with the U.S. Postal Service (a self supporting service, does not rely on taxpayer funding).  Amazingly Obama’s suggestions are in line with what the Postmaster General, Patrick Donahoe, wants; things like ending Saturday delivery and closing down post offices and processing centers across the country.

Here’s how the blind faith supporter of Obama reacted to the President’s response: “…just his willingness to look into it spoke volumes to me. I could definitely tell he cared.”-Corey O’Brian, Lackawanna County Commissioner and blind faith supporter of Barack Obama

Here in southeastern Idaho the only processing center on this side of the state, in Pocatello, is targeted for closing.  Local postal workers explained to me that if I wanted to send a letter to Idaho Falls (just an hour’s drive from where I live) it would end up going to Salt Lake City, Utah, to be sent back into Idaho before getting to Idaho Falls!

The problem, for us ‘customers’ of the USPS, and for our local economies, is that whether Obama and the Postmaster General get their way, or the U.S. Congress actually comes up with their own plan, or, the U.S. Congress allows the USPS to default, the results are going to be severe: Thousands of postal workers laid off, post offices closed down, processing centers closed down, etc.  As I’ve said before, what economic recovery?  And stop being so blind to what ‘our’ elected officials are doing!!!

Global Economic War: The big jumps in stock markets have nothing to do with economic recovery. It’s all part of the new way the Elite 1% make money.

“…the markets are basically run by algorithmic trading these days… Nobody’s making investments in the stock market thinking they’re getting a long term investment in the company that they’re buying a stock for. So all we’re looking at is trading on news.”-Catherine Mann, Brandeis University International Business School, and former member of the Federal Reserve bank Board of Governors

“…what you have right now is massive amount of liquidity around the world sitting on the sidelines with very cheap equity markets. So any time there’s a little bit of positive news, you see this explosion in stock markets, and because it’s so cheap and there’s so much money just sitting there ready to move.”-David Smick, economic policy strategist

PBS Newshour interviewed two ‘experts’ on why the stock markets are seeing huge swings up and down.  Both basically said it had nothing to do with economic recovery, it’s basically a war being fought with cash, and is the new way the 1% are making even more money. It’s being done without the labor or services of the 99%, by simply day trading on the World’s stock markets instead of creating new products or hiring more employees.  If you’re a rich bastard or bitch and you could make more money day trading than actually making a product or service (requiring you to spend money on employees and transportation and benefits and other costs associated with traditional enterprise) then why not?

“…that’s the way that banks fund themselves, is that they borrow in the overnight market from each other. And since the summer, we have been looking at the interest rate that they charge each other has been rising and rising and rising. It’s now at a level or was earlier today at the level right before the crisis with Lehman Brothers.”-Catherine Mann

“If you look at today and you say, when’s the last time that the global central banks got together, it was three days after the Lehman crisis in 2008.”  “The problem is…a solvency [the ability to pay your bills] problem in Europe, not a liquidity [cash, meaning the 1% have plenty of cash on hand] problem.”-David Smick

“…one of the downsides of this additional liquidity being put into the global marketplace is that it provides more ammunition for the traders in the marketplace who want to bet against the central bank, or against the European Central Bank in particular, or, want to bet against some of those sovereign governments in Europe that are running some difficulties.  So this excess liquidity, or a lot of liquidity, does have a downside. And I think that we aren’t thinking exactly how that ammunition is going to be used. We’re thinking it’s going to be used for good [like providing more jobs, creating new products and services, etc.], but there’s no guarantee that it’s going to be used for good.”  “…this intervention in Europe…doesn’t even come close to addressing the political problem that they face…National governments have spent too much money, they have borrowed too much over a long period of time.”-Catherine Mann

“It’s a little bit like the house is on fire, and…the pluming is backed up. Well, today, we took care of the plumbing [referring to the central banks of Europe, North America and Japan/Pacific Asia Group (the three member regions of the one world government seeking Trilateral Commission) agreeing to provide dirt cheap loans to the 1%] , but the house is still on fire.”-David Smick

 

 

Government Incompetence, What Economic Recovery? IRS fails to refund millions in taxes, blames postal addresses. Part of scheme to shut down U.S. Postal Service?

There are reports that the tax collector of the U.S. government, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), is holding back on refunding $153 million in overpaid taxes!

IRS officials claim it’s because of postal addresses they just don’t trust.  So they’re not going to mail them out!  99,123 U.S. taxpayers are waiting for those refunds!

Here’s the sinister answer the IRS has for solving the ‘problem’: Everyone needs to stop using the postal system and use direct deposit!

To check the status of your tax refund click on the “Where’s My Refund” at the IRS website.

Occupy America! U.S. Capitalist Airline industry is a big FAIL! History of bankruptcies and losses! Testimonies before Congress prove it! More proof that American Airlines can’t be trusted!

“The airline industry has the worst financial performance of any of our major business sectors. While the industry has enjoyed some profitable years, airline operators as a whole have lost money since deregulation in 1978.”– from Current Situation and Future Outlook of U.S. Commercial Airline Industry, September 28, 2005

In September 2005, the U.S. House of Representatives’ Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the Subcommittee on Aviation, heard testimonies on the economic viability of the U.S. airline industry.  It wasn’t good.

Here’s some quotes from the report:

“Historically, airlines have failed at a much higher rate than most other types of businesses.”

“In fact the U.S. airline industry has seen 150 bankruptcy filings in the last 25 years, an average of almost six per year.”

Bankruptcies don’t work because “…history has shown that the growth of airline industry capacity [a type of competition based on supply and demand] has continued unaffected even by major liquidations.”

“Over the past four years, U.S. commercial airlines have lost over $32 billion collectively and it is estimated that the industry will experience another $10 billion in loss in 2005.”

Don’t blame the September 11, 2001 attacks, the airlines were in trouble before that: “…well over 100,000 jobs have been lost in this industry since that time [the year 2000] and just recently, in concert with their announced bankruptcies…”

Don’t blame the cost of labor, like the CEO of American Airlines is doing: “Numerous factors have contributed to the problem and Mr. Kiefer mentioned some of them. I would say that three stand out in the current environment: very high jet fuel prices, intense price competition in the domestic market; and heavy debt and pension burdens.”

So they whine about fuel prices, but haven’t they been jacking up their ticket prices to cover that? They whine about competition! Isn’t competition the American Capitalist way? I think the mantra goes ‘if you can’t handle the competition then you should get out of the business’. And they whine about being in debt! You see, we individuals have been lectured for years about the sins of debt, yet the biggest debt offenders are the Corporations of America (after the Federal government)!

However, a professor from the Northeastern University Boston, and a senior fellow from the Brookings Institution, testified that in their opinion the three biggest costs to the airline industry is fuel, competition and labor.

Speaking of labor and American Airlines, the 2005 testimonies show that labor cost for the now bankrupt airline had already been reduced: “…airline employees have been asked to take substantial pay cuts, trim their benefits and in some cases, lose their jobs. Exhibit 5 in my remarks shows broad expense categories for AMR, parent of American Airlines, in 2002 and in the second quarter of 2005. Over that period labor costs declined from 41 percent of total expenses to 32 percent.”

Again, don’t blame the cost of labor: “…airlines have undertaken significant steps to trim their losses but these have so far been insufficient to restore profitability, largely because of the fuel prices.”

The nature of the industry makes it almost impossible to make a profit, it involves a lot of guessing and optimism: “The airline industry has always been a cyclical one because the demand for air travel is sensitive to the level of economic activity and carriers must invest in capacity well before they know the level of economic activity and demand.”

Airlines have always used bankruptcy to destroy union labor contracts, in the name of competition: “Legacy carriers have been cutting costs where they can and since labor is the largest category of airline costs, it has been the target
of cost cutting and enhanced productivity through negotiation as well as in bankruptcy as the legacy carriers seek to reduce costs to compete with low cost carriers.”

Some officials blamed the consumers for not being able to pay higher ticket prices, and blamed airline executives for not having the guts to pass on the true cost of fuel to their customers, again in the name of competition: “The airline industry however suffers from the burden of having to pay high prices without the flexibility of necessarily receiving higher fares. Historically, carriers have been loathe to pass on higher fuel costs in the form of any additional tariff for fear of being undercut by competition. This has led to a vicious cycle within the industry…” In other words, ticket prices haven’t gone high enough!

According to testimony from Moody’s officials, most airlines that go bankrupt don’t really change the way they do business: “Airlines operating in bankruptcy generally continue to pay airport rates and charges and in most cases do not radically downsize their operations.”

Testimony at the 2005 hearings foretold of American Airlines’ bankruptcy filing on November 29, 2011. The testimony was about what else American Airlines could do to further reduce their costs, and how to do it: Mr. MICA. “Again, pensions would still be sort of the big enchilada in obligations and fuel?”
Mr. BAGGALEY. “Actually, the largest portion of American and other airlines’ obligations are secured debt and leases. Pension deficits are significant but they are a minority of the total.”
Mr. MICA. “The only way you can restructure those would be through bankruptcy or negotiation?”
Mr. BAGGALEY. “Yes.”

Philip Baggaley, of Standard & Poor’s, also testified that many financial problems for the airline industry are “inherent” and go back before the 1990s.

Baggaley also explained that a major reason for legacy (airlines created before the 1978 deregulation) airlines filing bankruptcy was to destroy the pension (retirement) programs for their employees.  He admitted that financial institutions like to see companies destroy their employees’ retirement plans, and rewarded the companies with better credit ratings!

Baggaley also explained that wages and benefits are always the target of corporations, because it is the easiest to control.  Airline executives target labor as a way to offset the uncontrollable fuel costs. However, he showed that fuel costs have gone up so much that drastic labor cuts, without declaring bankruptcy, are no longer enough.  From 2002 to 2005 American Airlines gained, or saved, $1.8 billion in labor concessions, but they still lost $3.2 billion to fuel costs.

Baggaley also explained that while company mergers normally work for other industries, in reducing overall costs, history shows that mergers actually increase operating costs for legacy airlines.  He called it a “zero sum game”, and added that the only potential benefit for airlines filing for bankruptcy, and even merging, is that it’s a way of reducing competition: “…bankruptcy restructuring and mergers have the potential to improve the industry’s financial health, but only if accompanied by reduced capacity [a way of reducing competition] and, most important, by lowering operating costs.” Remember, competition is one of the three main reasons the airline industry is failing.

Mark Kiefer, of CRA International (economic and management consulting firm), testified that the problems with the airline industry go all the way back to the 1978 deregulation. He explained that the only time the airlines were really “profitable” was when they were being regulated by the Federal government!

Kiefer said government regulation kept ticket prices up, and limited the number of airlines allowed to operate (thus killing competition).  Since deregulation ticket prices dropped, and smaller more competitive airlines were born. Even after more than 30 years, the bigger, older (legacy) airlines just can not compete with the smaller younger Low Cost Carrier (LCC) airlines.  Under the traditional concept of capitalism, doesn’t that mean the legacy airlines should be allowed to die?

Kiefer also explained that the legacy airlines are still operating pre-deregulation when it came to wages and benefits for employees.  They tend to pay more than the LCC airlines, and offer company health and retirement benefits.  Kiefer says no LCC airline offers such benefits.  LCCs do offer “…defined contribution and profit sharing plans that have a much lower overall cost to the airline.”

Steven Morrison, Northeastern University Boston, and Clifford Winston from the Brookings Institution, say that, amazingly even after 30 years, the legacy airlines “…still needs time to adjust to its deregulatory freedoms by ridding itself of remaining cost inefficiencies…” In other words, the last hurdle to fully deregulating the legacy airlines is unionized labor.

But while the highly edjumacated college officials blamed labor for the airlines’ problems, U.S. Representative James Oberstar put the blame squarely on the legacy airlines: “Since deregulation, the legacy airlines’ revenue model has depended on extracting premium fares from a small percentage of passengers. That revenue model began to unravel in the year 2000…”

Of interest is the testimony from the executive director of the Air Carrier Association of America, Edward Faberman. Who better to explain to woes of the airline industry, and guess what, he did not blame labor!  He blamed, in order, fuel costs, homeland security costs, airport expenses, air traffic control expenses, Customs & Border Control service expenses, and finally cancelled flights.

Very interestingly, Faberman actually countered the claims of many of the experts mentioned above. Even though the airline industry was deregulated back in 1978, the legacy airlines are still getting subsidized by the government!  He basically said that in the name of competitive capitalism the big old legacy airlines should be allowed to die off, and that the LCCs should take over.

Finally, here’s what the airline officials in the United Kingdom think of the U.S. airline industry: “But America, land of the free, is turning itself into the land of the free ride. In the last four years, the airlines have soaked up $15 to $20 billion of public subsidy and loan guarantees. They’re operating in protected markets, they’re hoovering up public funds and they still can’t make a profit. They are dumping capacity on the North Atlantic, distorting competition and pricing for cash. They struggle to compete and, at some, the workforce has been demoralized. The more the government has tried to help, the worse things have become.”-Rod Eddington, CEO British Airways, September 22, 2005