Category Archives: Technology

NASA’s twisty-bendy F/A-18A

The Active Aeroelastic Wing (AAW) program (aka Boeing Phantom Works X-53) sought to determine the advantages of twisting flexible wings for primary maneuvering roll control at transonic and supersonic speeds, with traditional control surfaces such as ailerons and leading-edge flaps used to aerodynamically induce the twist. The idea is to design lighter, more flexible high aspect-ratio wings for future high-performance aircraft, which could translate to more economical operation or greater payload capability.

NASA photo, February 2003.

Active Aeroelastic Wing (AAW) F/A-18A (acquired in 1999 from the U.S. Navy) undergoes wing torsion testing at NASA’s Flight Loads Laboratory, Edwards Air Force Base, March-April 2001.

NASA photo, March 2001.

NASA Photo by Tom Tschida, April 2001.

Official NASA video:

NASA says the AAW program actually began in 1996, on paper.  Wings from NASA’s retired F/A-18 #840, formerly used in the High-Alpha Research Vehicle (HARV) project, were modified and installed on #853.

NASA photo, October 2001.

New paint-job, October 2001.

NASA photo by Tony Landis, 24OCT2001.

NASA Photo by Tom Tschida, 21MAR2002.

Before the official public unveiling, Centennial of Flight Commission decals were place on both sides of AAW 853, below the aft portion of the cockpit.  NASA says the AAW program was influenced by the fact that the Wright Brothers twisted the wings of their Wright Flyer to get it to turn.

NASA Photo by Tom Tschida, 21MAR2002.

NASA photo by Tony Landis, 27MAR2002.

In March 2002, NASA officially unveiled the modified AAW F/A-18A.

NASA Photo by Tom Tschida, 21MAR2002.

NASA photo, August 2002.

More wing torsion/vibration testing, August 2002.

NASA photo, August 2002.

NASA Photo by Tom Tschida, 22AUG2002.

15NOV2002, NASA photo by Tony Landis.

First flight of AAW F/A-18A #853 was 15NOV2002.

NASA photo by Carla Thomas, 15NOV2002.

During early flights it was determined that some of the original F/A-18 wings panels were too flexible at high speeds to create the desired roll rate.  The leading edge flap was divided into individually controlled sections, which seemed to solve the problem.

07FEB2003, NASA photo by Jim Ross.

February 2003.

07FEB2003, NASA photo by Jim Ross.

25JUN2003, NASA photo by Jim Ross.

Chased by another NASA F/A-18A, June 2003.

Official NASA video, 2003:

NASA photo, December 2004.

Flying over the U.S. Borax mine, near the Rogers Dry Lake, December 2004.

15DEC2004, NASA photo by Carla Thomas.

Official NASA video:

Official NASA video, March 2005:

The AAW program was officially completed in 2005.  The total cost of the AAW testing is estimated at $45-million.

NASA photo by Tony Landis, 18JUN2009.

In June 2009, the AAW #853 got a new lease on life, replacing an older NF-15B Integrated Resilient Aircraft Controls (IRAC) test aircraft, becoming the IRAC F/A-18A.

06APR2010, NASA photo by Tony Landis.

By April 2010, the tail flash/stripe was changed from reading AAW, to FAST (Full-scale Advanced Systems Testbed).

Official NASA video, 853 first flight as IRAC, April 2010:

06APR2010, NASA photo by Tony Landis.

06APR2010, NASA photo by Tony Landis.

One of the side benefits of aircraft testing is the creation of new computer systems which can be applied to other aircraft, military and civilian.

06APR2010, NASA photo by Tony Landis.

NASA VIKING, NO NOT THE MARS LANDERS! OR, LAST FLIGHT OF A VIKING.

F-16XL LAMINAR FLOW, ONCE AGAIN NASA (TAXPAYERS) SAVING THE ‘PRIVATE SECTOR’ AIRLINER INDUSTRY!

NASA’S 737, TEST-BED FOR THE CIVILIAN AIRLINER INDUSTRY!

Vehicle I-D: F-15EX-citement!

10 February 2021 (16:26-UTC-07 Tango 06) 22 Bahman 1399/27 Jumada t-Tania 1442/29 Wu-Yin 4718

After decades of wasting taxpayer’s money on ‘advanced’ aircraft projects that went nowhere, U.S. Air Force officials have finally pulled the heads outta the….clouds and approved the purchase of a much more practical fighter aircraft, or have they?

Boeing photo.

In July 2020 (under the administration of President Donald Trump), the United States Air Force (USAF) shelled-out $1.2-billion for eight F-15EX, much cheaper than the development nightmare known as the F-35, of between $77-million to $110-million purchase price per F-35, and that does not include the billions of dollars spent on the decades of development!  Add to that the per flight operating costs of the F-35, which currently are $3-thousand dollars more than the old F-15C Eagle.  Total lifetime cost of one F-35 is expected to be more than $1-trillion!  To top it off, insult-to-injury, the S/VTOL concept of the F-35 was directly influenced by the Soviet/Russian Yakovlev 141!  Unfortunately the F-15EX will not take the place of the F-35, but act as a complementary aircraft to the F-35.

(See also: USAF F-35A “COMBAT READY” IN UTAH

and TAXPAYER PARIAH F-35 CALLS IDAHO HOME!

and don’t forget  F-35 PARTS ARE MADE IN CHINA!)

Boeing photo.

On 02FEB2021, the USAF completed its first flight of the F-15EX, over Saint Louis, Missouri.  The aircraft was piloted by Matt Giese, Boeing’s chief test pilot for the EX.

Official Boeing first flight video:

In August 2020, it was announced that Oregon Air National Guard’s 173rd Fighter Wing (FW) and 142nd FW would be the lucky units to get the new EX-citement Eagle.  The 173rd will act as the ‘formal training unit’ for F-15EX conversion.  Lieutenant Colonel Nathan Rice says conversion shouldn’t take too long because “The F-15EX is almost 90% compatible with the F-15C Model.”

One of the advanced features of the EX Eagle is the 20-thousand hours life-span of the airframe: “….a long time, about double the service the life of an F-15C. Not only is the airframe designed to last for a long time, the F-15EX also has an ‘Open Mission System’ which allows the computer and avionics software to be more adaptable and more easily updated in the future. This adaptability is key, as we know that technology is continuing to accelerate.”-Colonel Jeff Edwards, 173rd FW commander

Two F-15EX fighters will be sent to Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, by the end of the first quarter of 2021, for testing. The USAF plans to eventually buy at least 144 F-15EX Eagles.

Official Boeing video explaining advance technologies on the Advanced F-15 test-bed:

Vehicle I-D: OREGON F-15C KOTKAT LENTÄÄ SUOMEN YLI

Let’s not forget the other taxpayer rip-off, the F-22 Raptor (which could’ve been avoided by simply upgrading the F-15):

ROBOT PAINTERS TO SAVE THE F-22 RAPTOR?

USAF ADMITS F-22 STEALTH JET IS A PAIN TO MAINTAIN, AND THAT’S JUST THE ‘SKIN’!

Vehicle I-D: AGMV

Photo by Paolo Bovo.

04FEB2021, U.S. Army Paratroopers assigned to 1st Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade, learn how to operate their new Army Ground Mobility Vehicle (AGMV) at Dandolo Training Area, Italy.

Photo by Paolo Bovo.

Video interview by Davide Dalla Massara, AGMV (or GMV) driver training in Italy:

Photo by Paolo Bovo.

U.S. Army Ground Mobility Vehicle (AGMV, or GMV), originally known as Ultra Light Combat Vehicle.

Photo by Private Laurie Ellen Schubert.

Since 2014 the United States Army has been looking for a light-weight vehicle that could be transported by CH-47 or UH-60 helicopters, yet be big enough to carry a squad of airborne infantry and their gear.

Photo by Private Laurie Ellen Schubert.

In May 2018, General Dynamics got a $33.8-million contract to build the new AGMV.  Since 2019, the 173rd Airborne Brigade has been training on their new AGMVs.

Photo by Staff Sergeant Jacob Sawyer.

August 2019, a CH-47 Chinook swallows an AGMV, Grafenwoehr Training Area, Germany.

Photo by Staff Sergeant Jacob Sawyer.

Photo by Staff Sergeant Austin Berner.

May 2019, Vojarna Josip Jovic Airbase, Croatia, the U.S. Army 1st Infantry Division CH-47 in the foreground sling loads a HMMWV pickup truck while the Chinook behind it carries the new AGMV.

Sling-load video by Specialist Ethan Valetski:

Photo by Staff Sergeant Austin Berner.

U.S. paratroopers with the 54th Engineer Battalion, 173rd Airborne Brigade, spread rain ponchos over their AGMV as it has started raining at Military Training Area Eugen Kvaternik, Croatia, May 2019.

Photo by Staff Sergeant Austin Berner.

Video interview, by Staff Sergeant Jacob Sawyer, explaining why the AGMV is needed:

Vehicle I-D: U.S. NAVY KEEPS OLD U.S. ARMY BOAT-TRUCK AFLOAT

Vehicle I-D: CHEVY MAKES HYDROGEN FUEL CELL ARMY TRUCK!

Vehicle I-D: Kuwaiti C-17 الكويت

U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Christopher Quail, 22JAN2021.

U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Christopher Quail, 22JAN2021.

On 22JAN2021, a Kuwaiti C-17 Globmaster-3 landed on Dover Air Force Base (AFB) in Delaware, United States.

USAF photo by Senior Airman Christopher Quail, 22JAN2021.

According to the U.S. Department of Defense, the Kuwaiti C-17 was visiting Dover AFB as part of a completion of a military sales deal.  Dover AFB is directly involved in $3.5-billion worth of yearly U.S. military sales to other countries.

USAF photo by Senior Airman Christopher Quail, 22JAN2021.

2021 is also the 30th Anniversary of the U.S. liberation of Kuwait during Operation Desert Storm.

USAF photo by Senior Airman Christopher Quail, 22JAN2021.

USAF photo by Senior Airman Christopher Quail, 22JAN2021.

The information released with the photos does not go into details about the U.S.-Kuwaiti military sales deal.   However in December 2020, the U.S. Department of State announced a $4.2-billion sale of U.S. military equipment to Kuwait, which included AH-64 Apache gunships and parts for Patriot missiles.

USAF photo by Senior Airman Christopher Quail, 22JAN2021.

Snowblind: C-130 OHIO C-17 PENNSYLVANIA

Bare Metal: C-17 STRIPPED

2018: USAF WINS FEMALE RECRUITS WITH BABY C-17

C-17 NOSE ART

Vehicle I-D: C-17 DUMPS HMMWVS ON SOUTH CAROLINA, AWESOME VID!

Total Force/Pivot to Asia: Operation Turning Point

07 February 2021 (02:38-UTC-07 Tango 06) 19 Bahman 1399/24 Jumada t-Tania 1442/26 Wu-Yin 4718

Since the presidency of Barack Obama, the U.S. Department of Defense is steadily shifting focus towards the Asia/Pacific region.  Sometimes known as Pivot to Asia, Pivot to Pacific, Total Force training for Near Peer Threats, maybe they should just bring back the phrase Cold War.

All photos by Petty Officer Second Class Michael Schutt.

It will be interesting to see how the new U.S. president, Joe ‘flip-flop’ Biden, handles the Department of Defense.  This month, the U.S. Navy SeaBees (construction engineers) and U.S. Marine Corps engineers have begun training to quickly build Expeditionary Advanced Bases (EAB) and Advanced Naval Bases (ANB), in case a major war in the Pacific breaks out.  (The U.S. Navy also just completed multinational Pacific region wargame Sea Dragon 2021)

On-loading of personnel and equipment, USS Pearl Harbor (LSD 52), 04FEB2021.  The training is called Exercise Turning Point, and is held every year by the Pacific Naval Construction Force (PacNCF). 

Photo by Petty Officer Second Class Michael Schutt.

USS Pearl Harbor (LSD 52) heads towards San Clemente Island from Port Hueneme, 04FEB2021.

Photo by Petty Officer Second Class Michael Schutt.

 06FEB2021, an Assault Craft Unit ONE (ACU-1) landed on San Clemente.

Obama era Force Design 2030: U.S. Marines get rid of all their main battle tanks!

Vehicle I-D: The Real Avengers, with the return to ‘Cold War’ mentality, many ‘force-on-force’ weapon systems are making a come-back. 

Pacific Partnership 2017: U.S. TAXPAYERS FUND POLICE TRAINING & CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN VIETNAM!

Great Reneger: TEXAS ARMOR DEPLOYS TO POLAND, PROOF WORLD WAR 3 IS NEAR?

World War 3: “NEAR PEER THREATS”, CODE FOR RUSSIA & CHINA AND THE COMING 3RD WORLD WAR?

World War 3: ICT is the USAF’s version of Total Force warfare

World War 3: “This is where armor fights!” Idaho Army National Guard returns to Total Force warfare

May 2015: According to the U.S. Naval War College “Starting in 2010, the U.S. and Vietnam accelerated this process effectively forming a partnership on several fronts. The Obama administration identified Vietnam as one of the new partners to cultivate as part of its ‘rebalancing’ of U.S. priorities toward the Asia-Pacific region, a move commonly referred to as the U.S.’s ‘pivot’ to the Pacific.” 

October 2013: “Although Mr. Obama has cut military spending in various parts of the world, it has remained largely unchanged in Asia. By 2020 the Pentagon plans to deploy 60 percent of its warships in the Pacific and 40 percent in the Atlantic, compared with the current 50-50 split.”-New York Times

Vehicle I-D:

U.S. Navy’s 1967 purchase price.

RAT ROD 1967 BLH AUSTIN-WESTERN USN SEABEES ROAD GRADER $14,794

Vehicle I-D: More U.S. Army Fake-News tanks, Tiger Stripes anybody?

U.S. Army photo by Specialist Savannah Miller, 26JAN2021.

Fake-News Soviet 125mm antitank gun, Hohenfels, Germany, January 2021.

USA photo by Specialist Audrequez Evans, 26OCT2020.

October 2020, Hohenfels, Germany.  M113 Fake-News T-72 used for crowd control training of Italian troops deploying to Kosovo.

USA photo by Joyce Costello, 26OCT2020.

USA photo by Specialist Audrequez Evans, 26OCT2020.

That’s correct, apparently the Kosovars are so unruly that you need tanks to suppress their protests!

USA photo by Corporal Tomarius Roberts, 04MAR2020.

Yep, another example of peace-keeping training using an M113 ‘T-72’ on ‘Kosovar’ demonstrators, Hohenfels, Germany, this time in March 2020.

USA photo by Corporal Tomarius Roberts, 04MAR2020.

Army National Guard photo by Sergeant Megan Zander, 01FEB2020.

Hohenfels Training Area, Germany, February 2020.  This M113 is supposed to be a ZSU-23-4.

USA photo by Specialist Nathan Franco, 14FEB2020.

‘T-72’ drives through a Bradley unit, Fort Irwin, California, February 2020.

USA photo by Private First Class James Newsome, 10FEB2020.

M113 Fake News BMP-2, Fort Irwin-National Training Center (NTC), California.

USA photo by Private Second Class Sayvon Johnson, 10FEB2020.

HMMWV (High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle) based ‘BRDM’, Fort Irwin-National Training Center (NTC).

USA photo by Private Second Class Sayvon Johnson, 10FEB2020.

USA photo by Private First Class Austin Anyzeski, 26JUN2017.

Which one is the BMP-2, and which one is the T-72?  Apparently, the only visual differences between the M113-T-72 and M113-BMP is the size of the gun tube, the front slope, and the BMP version has had the rear ramp removed and a long hull extension with clam-shell doors added-on.  The T-72 retains the M113 ramp.

USA photo by Private First Class Austin Anyzeski, 02JUN2017.

This is supposed to be a 2K22 Tunguska (except that it has a ‘BMP’ hull), Fort Irwin, June 2017.

USA photo by Private First Class Austin Anyzeski, 02JUN2017.

Anybody know what this M113 is dressed-up to be?

USA photo by Staff Sergeant David Edge, 08JUN2018.

I think it’s supposed to be an MTLB?

USA photo by Sergeant Josiah Pugh, 10APR2016.

In 2016, the U.S. Army OpFor at Hoehenfels, Germany, used real T-72s from Slovenia.

Video from 2016, by Austin Anyzeski, of Black Horse Fake News tanks at Fort Irwin:

USA photo by Private First Class Austin Anyzeski, 04JUN2017.

This is one of the ‘125mm Soviet anti-tank gun’ that took-out my M981 FiST-V during Idaho Army National Guard’s Fort Irwin rotation in Summer 1998 (see more This is Where Armor Fights).  It was hidden on one of the hills in the middle of The Valley of Death.

Before the 2000s, most of the OpFor tanks at Fort Irwin, California, were based on the M551 Sheridan airborne tank.

A M551 BMP-1.

M551 T-72.

A line of M551s in various disguises.  In the front is a BMP-1, followed by a ZSU-23-4 and three 2S1 self propelled artillery guns.

HMMWV BRDM nuclear, chemical, biological marker vehicle.

An early attempt to make a M113 look like a BMP.

A real (former Iraqi) MTLB-u.

Here’s a look at some real Soviet vehicles at Fort Irwin, photos I took in 1984 (with a crappy fixed-focus 110-film camera) while on one of my California Army National Guard drill weekends:

T-55

T-62

T-34-85

BTR-60

Plenty of MTLBs!

In the 1970s, U.S. Army in Germany began using ‘acquired’ Soviet armor in NATO wargames.

BMP-1, note the driver wearing the early style (Viet Nam era) CVC (Combat Vehicle Crewman) helmet.

BTR-60 in foreground, in the middle of the line is a BMP-1, in the background with a bunch of U.S. soldiers piled-in is a BTR-152.

BTR-152.

Cold War Vehicle I-D: FAKE NEWS ZSU-23-4 INTO THE J-A-W-S OF DEATH!

2020: IDAHO’S 1:1 SCALE FAKE NEWS RUSSIAN RADAR TANK

U.S. MARINES USE ‘FAKE NEWS’ MIG-23

HOW TO BUILD A 1:1 SCALE U.S. ARMY ‘FAKE NEWS’ BMP-2

Vehicle I-D, 2016:  M113 disguised as BMP

NASA’s 737, test-bed for the civilian airliner industry!

In a country where the capitalist corporate world is supposed to be independent of government interference, or even assistance, the U.S. airliner industry has been totally reliant upon taxpayer funded NASA for developing more efficient, and safer, technologies.

NASA’s Boeing 737-130 was the workhorse of such taxpayer funded testing and developments.  Serial Number SN-19437 (N515NA, tail #515) was born in 1968 (some sources say 1967), and reported for duty at NASA’s Langley Research Center in 1973.  Apparently 515 was the first prototype Boeing 737 built.

I must point out that between 1938 and 1978 the U.S. airline industry was under the total regulation of the federal government, being de-regulated beginning in 1978 with the hopes that capitalist competition would reign in growing costs of operation, but in reality has created the money-grubbing passenger unfriendly monstrosity of today.   Even with de-regulation the airliner industry still relies on taxpayer funded testing of new technologies.

515 took part in dozens of developments:  Microwave Landing Systems, velocity vector display development, CRT electronic cockpit displays, profile descent control law development, total energy control law development,  helmet mounted displays.  Also, satellite-based Global Positioning System for auto-landings, ground-air data-link in lieu of voice communication, traffic flow management ATC-compatible 4-D Flight Management System development, wind shear detection research.  Just to name a few.

In 1985, 515 joined several other NASA and FAA aircraft in the U.S. state of Maine, as well as in Canada, to study Runway Friction in bad weather.

In 1989, 515 got a new paint-job.

According to NASA, 515 was constantly modified, and even had two cockpits, the second cockpit being located where the airliner’s first class passengers would sit.

1990s NASA video showing 515 is use for wind-shear research.  The research was done because of the increasing number of crashes being caused by the weather phenomenon called wind-shear:

High lift wing testing, 1990s.

515 retired in  2003, and now resides at the Museum of Flight, in Seattle, Washington.

NASA: F-16XL LAMINAR FLOW, ONCE AGAIN NASA SAVING THE AIRLINER INDUSTRY!

NASA’S C-133 APOLLO DROP SHIP

 

California Orel nad Ukrainoy Орел над Украиной

Photo by Captain Jason Sanchez.

California Air National Guard, 144th Fighter Wing, 194th Fighter Squadron’s F-15C Eagle #84-004 preps to take-off from Fresno Yosemite International Airport, California, to participate in the Orange Flag wargame, along with aircrews from Edwards Air Force Base and China Lake Naval Air Station, 10DEC2019.

Photo by Captain Jason Sanchez.

Photo by Captain Jason Sanchez.

2019 California Capital Airshow at Mather Airport near Sacramento.

Photo by Technical Sergeant Charles Vaughn.

84-004 lands at Starokostiantyniv Air Base, Ukraine, for wargame Clear Sky, 06OCT2018.   

Photo by Technical Sergeant Charles Vaughn.

#84-004 was painted in an eagle motif for the 194FS’s 75th Anniversary, which was officially in 2018.  The 194FS was established in 1946, but was not federally recognized until 1948.

Clear Sky video explainer by Staff Sergeant Christian Jadot:

Photo by Technical Sergeant Charles Vaughn.

A California Eagle taxis past Ukrainian Sukhoi 27s, 09OCT2018.

Video report by Staff Sergeant Christian Jadot, a happy California Eagle pilot talks about “finally” being in Ukraine:

2017: CALIFORNIA CELEBRATES 20 YEARS OF OPS IN UKRAINE!

Finland: OREGON KOTKAT LENTÄÄ SUOMEN YLI

F-16XL Laminar Flow, once again NASA (taxpayers) saving the ‘private sector’ airliner industry!

Photo via NASA, 29SEP1997.

Four different versions of the General Dynamics F-16 shared the ramp at NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards, California, in this 1997 photo. At left and right are the only two F-16XL prototypes built. The two-seat F-16XL-2 version to the left, NASA registration number 848, was flown in a supersonic active/passive laminar flow control experiment until late 1996. The single-seat F-16XL-1 at right, NASA registration number 849 (originally USAF 749), was flown in a variety of experiments, including an earlier passive laminar-flown study and sonic boom attenuation research. At center left is a single-seat F-16A, NASA registration number 816, the only civil registered F-16 in existence. At center right is the U.S. Air Force Advanced Fighter Technology Integration (AFTI) F-16A.

Silent NASA video, F-16XL-1 #849 in-flight 1992:

NASA photo published in 1992.

NASA 849 F-16XL-1 in earlier passive laminar flow experiment.

NASA photo by Judson Brohmer, 1995.

By 1993, F-16XL-1 #849 was returned to original configuration to study the performance of the XL’s ‘cranked arrow’ wing.

NASA photo, October 1991.

NASA 848 F-16XL-2 prior to active/passive laminar flow wing glove modifications.  848 was originally a single seat USAF F-16A #75-0747,  which crashed at the end of 1980, was rebuilt as the first F-16XL in 1981, then rebuilt again as the two seat F-16XL-2 taking its first flight in 1982. 

NASA photo dated February 1995.

Mounting the perforated port ‘active’ laminar flow glove on #848.

NASA photo, June 1995.

This NASA photo shows you how tiny the perforations are in the port glove. The edge of a dime coin is used to show scale, NASA used a laser to drill the 10-million, almost microscopic, holes.

NASA photo dated 1995.

NASA photo dated 1995.

First flight of modified F-16XL-2. NASA photo by Carla Thomas, 1995.

First flight of fully modified F-16XL #848. Notice the wing tip sensors, which were used to study ‘flutter’ on 848 prior to being modified for laminar flow testing. They were not used during the bulk of the laminar flow testing. This NASA video explains the use of the wing tip ‘exciter vanes’ (Excitation System) on 848:

Flying over Lake Mead, Nevada. NASA photo by Jim Ross, October 1996.

A turbo-compressor vacuum mounted in the fuselage, behind the cockpit, draws off a small part of the boundary-layer air flowing over the port wing’s perforated titanium leading edge glove at supersonic speeds, this is known as Supersonic Laminar Flow Control, or active laminar flow system. The turbo compressor exhausts out the starboard side of the fuselage.

NASA photo, 1995.

A turbo-compressor (looking like a axillary power unit, APU) in the aircraft’s fuselage provided suction to draw air through more than 10-million tiny laser-drilled holes in the titanium glove via a manifold system employing 20 valves.

NASA photo published in 1996.

In some photos you’ll notice a small canard, known as a ‘shock fence’, protruding from under the leading edge.  In a few photos it’s not present.

NASA photo by Jim Ross, April 1996.

Note that the leading edge on the starboard side is different.

Refueling on its 45th and final data-collection flight, November 1996.

The starboard leading edge was known as the passive laminar flow system.

45th and final data-collection flight of F-16XL 848, November 1996. NASA photo by Jim Ross.

NASA video, one hour of ‘raw’ (unedited) video of F-16XL-2 in flight:

Data obtained during the program was collected in the hopes of developing civilian transport aircraft (specifically Boeing, Rockwell, and McDonnell Douglas) that could cruise at supersonic speeds.

WINGLETS, OR ONCE AGAIN NASA SAVES THE PRIVATE SECTOR!

NASA’S TUPOLEV 144 SST

NASA’s C-133 Apollo drop ship

A 13-thousand-pound (5896.7-kilos) Apollo Command Module 19A test mock-up (aka boilerplate) was used to test various systems before the actual Apollo was launched, including parachutes.

NASA photos.

On 03JUL1968, NASA’s C-133 Cargomaster drops the Apollo ‘boilerplate’ for parachute (aka Earth Landing System) testing.

The first ELS test was conducted on 03MAY1963.  Between 1963 and 1968, 34 drop tests, using various ‘boilerplate’ modules with different parachute configurations, were completed.

Silent NASA video:

‘Boilerplate’ coming down on the Southern California-El Centro desert, 16JUN1968.

Original Northrop Ventura Corporation documentary film:

See an actual boilerplate module at Columbia Memorial Science Center, in California.

NASA photo 1963.

NASA also used the C-133 to haul what was called the Centaur Upper Stage shuttle rocket.  The Centaur Upper Stage shuttle rocket has been periodically brought back to life as a cheaper alternative to the Space Shuttle.  NASA C-133s also transported stages for Atlas, Saturn and Titan rockets to Cape Canaveral, Florida.

NASA’s Viking, no not the Mars Landers! 

Travis Air Force Base: C-133 Cargomaster