Tag Archives: police crime

United Police States of America: The U.S. is not governed by the Rule of Law, Obama can kill you without explaining why

So much for the Rule of Law.  How many times has George Bush Jr used that phrase during one of his many speeches justifying the War on Terror?  Well the Obama administration proves that the U.S. government operates without due process, without regard for the law, they make up secret laws as they go.

“The Justice Department wrote a secret memorandum authorizing the lethal targeting of Anwar al-Aulaqi, the American-born radical cleric who was killed by a U.S. drone strike Friday, according to administration officials. The document was produced following a review of the legal issues raised by striking a U.S. citizen and involved senior lawyers from across the administration. There was no dissent about the legality of killing Aulaqi, the officials said.”-Washington Post

In the recent killings of two U.S. citizens, Anwar al Awlaki and Samir Khan, President Barack Obama says the Justice Department came up with legal justification for the killing, even though al Awlaki has never been directly linked with any attacks against the U.S.  He was killed for speaking his mind!

“The White House refused to offer evidence of al-Awlaki’s role in terrorism or answer questions about the standard for killing an American.”-Washington Post

Here’s an interesting statement: Obama called al Awlaki “…the leader of external operations for Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula.” What’s interesting is that it’s the first time the United States referred to al Awlaki in that way!  In fact, it was after they killed him that the U.S. government “linked” him directly to attempted terrorist attacks (the main stream media bought the bullshit)!

There are media reports out of the Middle East that say al Awlaki’s assassination coincided with the return of the pro-U.S. president of Yemen, from medical exile after being wounded in an attack on his life.  Al Awlaki was seen as a leader in the Arab uprising going on in Yemen right now, and a threat to the pro-U.S. president of Yemen.  That’s probably the real reason he was killed.

Here’s another interesting point, the mosque in Virginia, where al Awlaki preached, stated that his message was of tolerance, until he went to Yemen, where he was arrested and tortured by the pro-U.S. Yemen government.  After that is when he started making statements against the U.S.  Well no surprise there, but then all these holier than tho police state NAZIs actually expect you to thank them after they torture you!

And what did U.S. citizen Samir Khan do?  He edited a Jihadi Internet magazine!  So I guess us bloggers are fair game.

Many people might say that since the U.S. Justice Department legally justified the killing, then it must be legal.  The problem is that in a society run by the Rule of Law, all laws must be public knowledge (remember the saying: Ignorance of the law is no excuse).  This “law” the Obama administration came up with is “classified”.

So now, in the United States, the land of the Rule of Law, is a secret law that says the President of the United States can kill any U.S. citizen based on what that citizen says, or who they piss off!  Who’s the real terrorist here?

 

 

 

United Police States of America: Witness to police crime being sued for recording video of the crime, does your state have laws that could make you a criminal for recording police crimes?

In 2009 a man was beaten unconscious by Springfield, Massachusetts, police.  A witness recorded video of the crime.  Now that witness is being threatened with a lawsuit, and even criminal charges.

Officials are citing a Massachusetts law that prohibits “…the secret use of such devices [recorders] by private individuals…”. However, attorney’s for the woman who recorded the police crime, say the law was meant to be applied to organized crime, not individual citizens: “Even a cursory review of the law would show that the Legislature took the time to insert a preamble into the statute showing that it is specifically aimed at organized crime prosecutions.”-Daniel D. Kelly, attorney

The woman posted the video on the internet, you can see it in a report posted by masslive.com.  The victim tries to run from police, but is caught.  One police officer then proceeds to beat him, sometimes the blows are so loud you can hear them in the video.  You can also hear people in the background begging police not to hurt him.  The beating continues until the man is unconscious.  For more than 15 minutes police stand around, as if they’re trying to figure out what to do, some are laughing.  After eleven or twelve minutes some of the residents of the neighborhood come out, asking for an explaination.

Massachusetts is one of several states that use a law that requires “consent” before you can record a conversation.  Other states include California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington.  Massachusetts is claiming the woman who video recorded the police crime, violated the two-party consent law because she recorded audio.  Apparently if she had recorded silent video she would have been within the law.